Former Defense Contractor Employee and Wife Plead Guilty to Conspiring to Defraud Millions in Scheme Involving Supplies to Afghan National Army

Keith Johnson, 46, and his wife, Angela Johnson, 44, of Maryville, Tenn., pleaded guilty today to their roles in a $9.7 million procurement fraud scheme.

Mythili Raman, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division; Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; Valerie Parlave, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office; Robert E. Craig, Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) Special Agent in Charge of Mid-Atlantic Field Office; John Sopko, Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR); and Frank Robey, Director of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command’s Major Procurement Fraud Unit (MPFU), made the announcement after the pleas were accepted by U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema of the Eastern District of Virginia.

The Johnsons were indicted on July 16, 2013, by a federal grand jury on conspiracy to commit wire fraud and wire fraud charges.  Keith Johnson faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, and Angela Johnson faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison when they are sentenced on Feb. 14, 2014.

In a statement of facts filed with the plea agreement, Keith Johnson admitted to serving as the program manager for a Department of Defense contractor that operated a central maintenance facility (CMF) in Kabul, Afghanistan, and other facilities in that country to maintain and repair vehicles used by the Afghan National Army.  In his position during 2007 to 2008, Keith Johnson was involved in purchasing vehicle parts from vendors.  The Johnsons formed a company in Tennessee, Military Logistics Support (MLS), and listed only the names of relatives as officials in the documents filed.  Angela Johnson operated the company.  When Keith Johnson’s company solicited quotes for different vehicle parts that were needed, Angela Johnson, using her maiden name of “Angela Gregory” to conceal her relationship to Keith Johnson, responded with quotes based on parts that she was able to purchase from other vendors of vehicle parts.  Keith Johnson used his position as program manager to write letters justifying awards of purchase orders for parts to MLS without seeking competitive quotes, and in instances in which there had been competitive quotes, approving recommendations that the awards be made to MLS.

The Johnsons also conspired with John Eisner and Jerry Kieffer, two individuals who worked at the CMF as subcontractors to Keith Johnson’s company, to have Keith Johnson similarly steer purchase orders for other types of vehicle parts to Eisner’s and Kieffer’s separate company, Taurus Holdings.  Eisner submitted the quotes for Taurus using a fake name to conceal his connection to the subcontractor.  Eisner and Kieffer paid kickbacks to the Johnsons and on occasion engaged in collusive bidding with the Johnsons so that MLS could win competitions for certain purchase orders.  Eisner and Kieffer previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy and will be sentenced on Dec. 18, 2013.

As a result of the scheme, Keith Johnson’s company awarded MLS at least $9.7 million worth of purchase orders for vehicle parts by Keith Johnson’s company.

This case was investigated by DCIS, FBI, SIGAR and Army MPFU.  Trial Attorney Daniel Butler of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and Assistant United States Attorneys Jack Hanly and Ryan Faulconer of the Eastern District of Virginia are prosecuting the case on behalf of the United States.

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT REQUIRES US AIRWAYS AND AMERICAN AIRLINES TO DIVEST FACILITIES AT SEVEN KEY AIRPORTS TO ENHANCE SYSTEM-WIDE COMPETITION AND SETTLE MERGER CHALLENGE

Divestitures at Airports in Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York and Near Washington, D.C. Opens Door for Low Cost Carriers to Compete Resulting in More Choices and More Competitive Airfares for Consumers

WASHINGTON — The  Department of Justice today announced that it is requiring US Airways Group Inc. and American  Airlines’ parent corporation, AMR Corp. to divest slots and gates at key  constrained airports across the country to low cost carrier airlines (LCCs) in  order to enhance system-wide competition in the airline industry resulting in  more choices and more competitive airfares for consumers.

The  department said the proposed settlement will increase the presence of the LCCs  at Boston Logan International, Chicago O’Hare International, Dallas Love Field,  Los Angeles International, Miami International, New York LaGuardia  International and Ronald Reagan Washington National.  Providing the LCCs with the incentive and  ability to invest in new capacity and permitting them to compete more  extensively nationwide will enhance meaningful competition in the industry and  benefit airline travelers.

“This  agreement has the potential to shift the landscape of the airline industry. By  guaranteeing a bigger foothold for low-cost carriers at key U.S. airports, this  settlement ensures airline passengers will see more competition on nonstop and  connecting routes throughout the country,” said Attorney General Eric Holder.  “The department’s ultimate goal has remained steadfast throughout this process  – to ensure vigorous competition in airline travel. This is vital to millions  of consumers who will benefit from both more competitive prices and enhanced  travel options.”

Six  state attorneys general–Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Tennessee and  Virginia–and the District of Columbia joined in the department’s proposed  settlement, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of  Columbia.  If approved by the court, the  settlement will resolve the department’s competitive concerns and the  lawsuit.

“The  extensive slot and gate divestitures at these key airports are groundbreaking  and they will dramatically enhance the ability of LCCs to compete system-wide,”  said Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer of the Department of Justice’s  Antitrust Division.  “This settlement  will disrupt the cozy relationships among the incumbent legacy carriers,  increase access to key congested airports and provide consumers with more  choices and more competitive airfares on flights all across the country.”

On  Aug. 13, 2013, the department, six state attorneys general and the District of  Columbia filed an antitrust lawsuit against US Airways and American alleging  that US Airway’s $11 billion acquisition of American would have substantially  lessened competition for commercial air travel in local markets throughout the  United States.  The department alleged  that the transaction would result in passengers paying higher airfares and  receiving less service.  In addition, the  department alleged that the transaction would entrench the merged airline as  the dominant carrier at Reagan National, where it would control 69 percent of  take-off and landing slots, thus effectively foreclosing entry or expansion by  competing airlines.

The  settlement requires US Airways and American to divest slots, gates and ground  facilities at key airports around the country.   Specifically, the settlement requires the companies to divest or  transfer to low cost carrier purchasers approved by the department:

All  104 air carrier slots (i.e. slots not reserved for use only by smaller,  commuter planes) at Reagan National and rights and interest in other facilities  at the airport necessary to support the use of the slots;

Thirty-four  slots at LaGuardia and rights and interest in other facilities at the airport  necessary to support the use of the slots; and

Rights  and interests to two airport gates and associated ground facilities at each  of  Boston Logan, Chicago O’Hare, Dallas  Love Field, Los Angeles International and Miami International.

The  Reagan National and LaGuardia slots will be sold under procedures approved by  the department.  Under the terms of the  settlement, JetBlue at Reagan National and Southwest at LaGuardia will be given  the opportunity to acquire the slots they currently lease from American.  The remaining 88 slots at Reagan National and  24 slots at LaGuardia plus any JetBlue or Southwest decline to acquire will be  grouped into bundles, taking into account specific slot times to ensure  commercially viable and competitive patterns of service for the recipients of  the divested slots.  The parties will  divest these slot bundles and all rights and interests in any gates and other  ground facilities (e.g., ticket counters, baggage handling facilities, office  space and loading bridges) as necessary to support the use of the purchased  slots.

The  gates at the five airports will be transferred on commercially reasonable terms  to the new acquirers.  The acquirers of  the slot and gate divestitures also require approval of the department.  Preference will be given to airlines at each  airport that do not currently operate a large share of slots or gates.

The  proposed settlement allows the department to appoint a monitoring trustee to  oversee the divestitures or transfers of the slots and gates. The settlement  also prohibits the merged company from reacquiring an ownership interest in the  divested slots or gates during the term of the settlement.  The companies must also provide advance  notice of any future slot acquisition at Reagan National regardless of whether  or not it is a reportable transaction under the premerger notification law and  further provides for waiting periods and opportunities for the department to  obtain additional information in order to review the transaction.

AMR  is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Fort Worth,  Texas.  AMR is the parent company of  American Airlines.  Last year American  flew more than 80 million passengers to more than 250 destinations worldwide  and took in more than $24 billion in revenue.   In November 2011, American filed for bankruptcy reorganization.

US Airways is a Delaware  corporation with its principal place of business in Tempe, Ariz.  Last year US Airways flew more than 50  million passengers to more than 200 destinations worldwide and took in more  than $13 billion in revenue.

Northern California Real Estate Investor Agrees to Plead Guilty to Bid Rigging at Public Foreclosure Auctions; Investigations Have Yielded 38 Plea Agreements to Date

A Northern California real estate investor has agreed to plead guilty for his role in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California, the Department of Justice announced.

Felony charges were filed today in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in Oakland against Chuokee “Joseph” Bo of Pleasanton, Calif.

Bo is the 38th individual to plead guilty or agree to plead guilty as a  result of the department’s ongoing antitrust investigations into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California.

According to court documents, Bo conspired with others not to bid against one another, but instead designated a winning bidder to obtain selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Alameda County, Calif.    Bo was also charged with conspiring to use the mail to carry out a scheme to fraudulently acquire title to selected Alameda County properties sold at public auctions, to make and receive payoffs, and to divert money to co-conspirators that would have otherwise gone to mortgage holders and others by holding second, private auctions open only to members of the conspiracy.  The department said that the selected properties were then awarded to the conspirators who submitted the highest bids in the second, private auctions.  The private auctions often took place at or near the courthouse steps where the public auctions were held.  Bo is charged with participating in the conspiracies beginning as early as August 2009 and continuing until about October 2010.

“Today’s plea agreement is the latest step in the Antitrust Division’s efforts to preserve open competition in local markets,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division.  “The division remains committed to prosecuting individuals who subvert the competitive process for their own profit.”

The department said that the primary purpose of the conspiracies was to suppress and restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in order to obtain selected real estate offered at Alameda County public foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices.  When real estate properties are sold at these auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the mortgage and other debt attached to the property, with remaining proceeds, if any, paid to the homeowner.  According to court documents, these conspirators paid and received money that otherwise would have gone to pay off the mortgage and other holders of debt secured by the properties, and, in some cases, the defaulting homeowner.

“This is another example of justice being served in preserving the fairness of public real estate foreclosure auctions as well as the FBI’s commitment in investigating those who take advantage of a competitive marketplace,” said David J. Johnson, FBI Special Agent in Charge of the San Francisco Field Office. “Criminal activity like this takes place in our communities and we continue to rely on the public’s help in seeking those who cheat the system.”

A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals.  The maximum fine for the Sherman Act charges may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims if either amount is greater than $1 million.  A count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.  The government can also seek to forfeit the proceeds earned from participating in the conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

Today’s charges are the latest filed by the department in its ongoing investigation into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa, and Alameda counties, Calif.  These investigations are being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San Francisco Office.  Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to public real estate foreclosure auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office at 415-436-6660, visit  www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.html or call the FBI tip line at 415-553-7400.

Today’s charges were brought in connection with the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.  The task force was established to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.  With more than 20 federal agencies, 94 U.S. Attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it is the broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory agencies ever assembled to combat fraud.  Since its formation, the task force has made great strides in facilitating increased investigation and prosecution of financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among federal, state and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending and financial markets and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial institutions and other organizations. Over the past three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed nearly 10,000 financial fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants, including more than 2,900 mortgage fraud defendants. For more information on the task force, please visit  www.StopFraud.gov.

Iraqi-Based Construction Company Pays $2.7 Million to U.s. for Alleged False Claims in Bribery Scheme

Iraqi Consultants and Construction Bureau (ICCB) has paid the U.S. $2.7 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by bribing a U.S. government official to obtain U.S. government contracts in Iraq, the Department of Justice announced today.  ICCB is a privately owned construction company headquartered in Baghdad, Iraq.

“Bribery will not be tolerated in government contracting,” said Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Division Stuart F. Delery.  “We will ensure that government contracts are awarded based on merit and pursue allegations of fraudulently procured contracts wherever they occur.”

The government alleged that, from 2007 to 2008, ICCB paid bribes to Army Corps of Engineers procurement official John Salama Markus, 41, of Nazareth, Pa., to obtain information that gave it an advantage in bidding on several construction contracts with the Department of Defense in Iraq.  The contracts supported reconstruction efforts involving the Iraq war, including infrastructure and security projects and the building of medical facilities and schools.  ICCB then knowingly overcharged the U.S. for services provided under the contracts, according to the government’s allegation.

“It is offensive that anyone would see projects to promote stability, health and education in a rebuilding country as a way to make illegal cash on the side,” said U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey Paul J. Fishman.  “We will not abide companies paying to play in such a system.”

“The Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) is committed to protecting the integrity of the Defense acquisition process from personal and corporate avarice,” said Special Agent in Charge, DCIS Northeast Field Office Craig Rupert.  “Ensuring the proper use of U.S. taxpayers’ dollars and preventing contract fraud is in our nation’s interest and remains a priority.”

The settlement is part of a larger investigation initiated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey.  As part of that investigation, Markus pleaded guilty on Sept. 7, 2012, to wire fraud, money laundering and failure to report a foreign bank account in connection with more than $50 million in contracts awarded to foreign companies in Gulf Region North, Iraq.  Markus was sentenced to 13 years in prison on March 12, 2013, in Newark, N.J., federal court.

The investigation is being handled by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey and the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, in cooperation with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the Major Procurement Fraud Unit of the Army’s Criminal Investigation Command, the Criminal Investigative Division of the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Homeland Security.  The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only; there has been no determination of liability.

Iraqi-Based Construction Company Pays $2.7 Million to U.s. for Alleged False Claims in Bribery Scheme

Iraqi Consultants and Construction Bureau (ICCB) has paid the U.S. $2.7 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by bribing a U.S. government official to obtain U.S. government contracts in Iraq, the Department of Justice announced today.  ICCB is a privately owned construction company headquartered in Baghdad, Iraq.

“Bribery will not be tolerated in government contracting,” said Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Division Stuart F. Delery.  “We will ensure that government contracts are awarded based on merit and pursue allegations of fraudulently procured contracts wherever they occur.”

The government alleged that, from 2007 to 2008, ICCB paid bribes to Army Corps of Engineers procurement official John Salama Markus, 41, of Nazareth, Pa., to obtain information that gave it an advantage in bidding on several construction contracts with the Department of Defense in Iraq.  The contracts supported reconstruction efforts involving the Iraq war, including infrastructure and security projects and the building of medical facilities and schools.  ICCB then knowingly overcharged the U.S. for services provided under the contracts, according to the government’s allegation.

“It is offensive that anyone would see projects to promote stability, health and education in a rebuilding country as a way to make illegal cash on the side,” said U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey Paul J. Fishman.  “We will not abide companies paying to play in such a system.”

“The Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) is committed to protecting the integrity of the Defense acquisition process from personal and corporate avarice,” said Special Agent in Charge, DCIS Northeast Field Office Craig Rupert.  “Ensuring the proper use of U.S. taxpayers’ dollars and preventing contract fraud is in our nation’s interest and remains a priority.”

The settlement is part of a larger investigation initiated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey.  As part of that investigation, Markus pleaded guilty on Sept. 7, 2012, to wire fraud, money laundering and failure to report a foreign bank account in connection with more than $50 million in contracts awarded to foreign companies in Gulf Region North, Iraq.  Markus was sentenced to 13 years in prison on March 12, 2013, in Newark, N.J., federal court.

The investigation is being handled by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey and the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, in cooperation with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the Major Procurement Fraud Unit of the Army’s Criminal Investigation Command, the Criminal Investigative Division of the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Homeland Security.  The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only; there has been no determination of liability.

Home Health Agency Owner Sentenced for Role in $13.8 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme

Detroit-area resident Javed Rehman was sentenced to serve 60 months in prison today for his role in a $13.8 million Medicare fraud scheme.
Acting Assistant Attorney General Mythili Raman of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Barbara L. McQuade of the Eastern District of Michigan, Special Agent in Charge Paul M. Abbate of the FBI’s Detroit Field Office, and Special Agent in Charge Lamont Pugh III of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG) Office of Investigations’ Detroit Office made the announcement.
Rehman, 50, of Farmington Hills, Mich., was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Gerald E. Rosen in the Eastern District of Michigan.  In addition to his prison term, Rehman was sentenced to serve two years of supervised release and was ordered to pay $1,734,801 in restitution, jointly and severally with his co-defendants.  Rehman pleaded guilty on July 12, 2013, before Judge Rosen to one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud.
According to court records, in or around May 2009, Rehman purchased Quantum Home Care Inc. with co-conspirators Tausif Rahman and Muhammad Ahmad.  Rehman paid kickbacks to recruiters to obtain Medicare beneficiary information used to bill Medicare for home health services – including physical therapy and skilled nursing services – that were never rendered.  Rehman was the administrator of Quantum and was responsible for the submission of false and fraudulent claims to Medicare based on falsified files created by the co-conspirators.
Medicare paid approximately $1.7 million to Quantum for physical therapy and skilled nursing services that Quantum purported to render between approximately June 2009 and September 2011.  According to court documents, between 2008 and 2009, Rehman’s co-conspirators acquired control of three other home health care companies.  The four companies, including Quantum, received approximately $13.8 million from Medicare in the course of the conspiracy.
Rahman pleaded guilty on Jan. 5, 2012, to one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and one count of money laundering and is scheduled for sentencing on May 21, 2014.  Ahmad pleaded guilty on Aug. 28, 2012, to one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and is scheduled for sentencing on May 14, 2014.
This case was investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and was brought as part of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, under the supervision of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan.  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant Chief Catherine K. Dick of the Fraud Section.
Since its inception in March 2007, the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, now operating in nine cities across the country, has charged more than 1,500 defendants who have collectively billed the Medicare program for more than $5 billion.  In addition, HHS’s Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, working in conjunction with HHS-OIG, is taking steps to increase accountability and decrease the presence of fraudulent providers.

Detroit-Area Home Health Care Agency Owner Sentenced for Role in $2.2 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme

The owner of a Detroit-area home health care agency was sentenced today to serve 65 months in prison for her leading role in a $2.2 million Medicare fraud scheme.
Acting Assistant Attorney General Mythili Raman of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Barbara L. McQuade of the Eastern District of Michigan, Special Agent in Charge Paul M. Abbate of the FBI’s Detroit Field Office, and Special Agent in Charge Lamont Pugh III of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG) Office of Investigations’ Detroit Office made the announcement.
Mehran Javidan, 51, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Denise Page Hood in the Eastern District of Michigan. In addition to her prison term, Javidan was sentenced to serve three years of supervised release and was ordered to pay $2.2 million in restitution, jointly and severally with her co-defendants.
Javidan was convicted by a federal jury on April 2, 2013, of one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, three counts of health care fraud, three counts of making false statements related to health care matters and one count of conspiracy to solicit or pay health care kickbacks in exchange for referrals of patients to home health care company Acure Home Care Inc. (Acure).  The jury found Javidan not guilty of one count of making false statements and one count of health care fraud and did not reach a verdict on one additional count of health care fraud.
Javidan was initially charged along with two other defendants in an indictment unsealed on Feb. 17, 2011, as part of a nationwide Medicare fraud takedown.  One co-defendant was also convicted on April 2, 2013, while the other remains a fugitive.
According to evidence presented at trial, Javidan owned and operated Acure, a home health care company in Oak Park, Mich., and later Troy, Mich.  Javidan paid doctors to refer non-homebound patients for physical therapy treatment that was medically unnecessary.  The evidence showed that she also paid patient recruiters to obtain Medicare information and pre-signed physical therapy documents from Medicare beneficiaries.  The recruiters for Acure obtained the Medicare information and pre-signed forms by paying patients in cash and by promising that the referring doctors would prescribe them narcotic prescriptions.
Evidence presented at trial established that Javidan paid physical therapists and physical therapy assistants employed by Acure to create false and fraudulent physical therapy files using the blank, pre-signed forms to make it appear as if physical therapy services were actually rendered, when in fact, the services had not been rendered.
Javidan then directed the submission of Acure’s falsified billing to Medicare.  Acure was paid more than $2.2 million from Medicare between December 2008 and November 2010.
The investigation was led by the FBI and HHS-OIG and was brought by the Medicare Fraud Strike Force under the supervision of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan.  The case was prosecuted by Assistant Chief Catherine K. Dick and Trial Attorney Niall M. O’Donnell of the Fraud Section.
Since its inception in March 2007, the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, now operating in Chicago and eight other cities across the country, has charged more than 1,500 defendants who have collectively billed the Medicare program for more than $5 billion.  In addition, HHS’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, working in conjunction with HHS-OIG, are taking steps to increase accountability and decrease the presence of fraudulent providers.

Patient Broker of South Florida Psychiatric Hospital Sentenced for Role in $67 Million Health Care Fraud Scheme

A patient broker of a South Florida psychiatric hospital was sentenced today to serve 24 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release for her participation in a $67 million Medicare fraud scheme.
Acting Assistant Attorney General Mythili Raman of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Wifredo A. Ferrer of the Southern District of Florida, Special Agent in Charge Michael B. Steinbach of the FBI’s Miami Field Office, and Special Agent in Charge Christopher Dennis of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG) Office of Investigations’ Miami Office made the announcement.
Gloria Himmons, 54, of Union Springs, Ala., was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Jose E. Martinez in the Southern District of Florida.  In March 2013, Himmons pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to receive health care kickbacks and one count of receiving a health care kickback.  In addition to her prison term, Himmons was ordered to pay $14 million in restitution, joint and severally with her co-defendants.
According to court documents, Himmons was a patient broker at Hollywood Pavilion LLC (HP), a state-licensed psychiatric hospital in South Florida that purported to offer both inpatient and outpatient mental health services.  Himmons would provide Medicare beneficiaries to HP in exchange for bribes and kickbacks, and she knew that the patients she provided to HP were not appropriate for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization or for outpatient mental health treatment.  The patients she provided to HP included those who were not severely mentally ill, as well as substance abusers looking for rehabilitation programs.  The patients did not have legitimate referrals from hospitals or doctors who had been treating acute-phase, severe mental illness.
From at least 2005 through September 2012, in exchange for bribes and kickbacks, Himmons knowingly and willfully provided to HP Medicare beneficiaries who did not need inpatient or outpatient psychiatric treatment.  As a result of Himmons’s participation in this scheme, HP was improperly paid more than $7 million by Medicare.  From at least 2003 through at least August 2012, HP billed Medicare approximately $67 million for services that were not properly rendered, for patients that did not qualify for the services being billed, and for claims for patients who were procured through bribes and kickbacks.  Medicare reimbursed HP on approximately $40 million of those claims.
On Sept. 10, 2013, co-defendants Karen Kallen-Zury, Daisy Miller and Christian Coloma were sentenced on their June 2013 jury convictions.  Kallen-Zury, the chief executive officer of HP, and Miller and Coloma were convicted on all counts at trial and sentenced to 300 months, 180 months and 144 months, respectively.  Kallen-Zury and Miller were ordered to pay, jointly and severally with their co-defendants, nearly $40 million in restitution.  Coloma was ordered to pay, jointly and severally, more than $20 million in restitution.
This case was investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and was brought as part of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, under the supervision of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Miami.  This case is being prosecuted by Assistant Chief Robert A. Zink and Trial Attorneys Andrew H. Warren and Anne McNamara of the Fraud Section.
Since their inception in March 2007, Medicare Fraud Strike Force operations in nine locations have charged more than 1,500 defendants who collectively have falsely billed the Medicare program for more than $5 billion.  In addition, the HHS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, working in conjunction with the HHS-OIG, are taking steps to increase accountability and decrease the presence of fraudulent providers.

New York Check Cashing Company and Owner Plead Guilty for Roles in $19 Million Scheme

Belair Payroll Services Inc. (Belair), a multi-branch check cashing company in Flushing, N.Y., and its owner, Craig Panzera, 47, pleaded guilty today for failing to follow reporting and anti-money laundering requirements for more than $19 million in transactions, in violation of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).   Panzera also pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the United States by willfully failing to pay income and payroll taxes.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Mythili Raman of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch of the Eastern District of New York, Acting Director John Sandweg of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and Chief Richard Weber of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) made the announcement.

As part of the guilty plea, Belair will forfeit $3,267,252.10, and Panzera will pay restitution in the amount of $946,841.17 to the IRS.  Sentencing for Belair and Panzera will be determined at a later date.

According to court records, from in or about June 2009 through June 2011, certain individuals presented to Belair’s manager and other employees checks to be cashed at Belair.  The checks were written on accounts of shell corporations that appeared to be health care related, but in fact, the corporations did no legitimate business.  The shell corporations and their corresponding bank accounts on which the checks were written were established in the names of foreign nationals, many of whom were no longer in the United States.

Belair accepted these checks and provided cash in excess of $10,000 to the individuals. Panzera and others at Belair never obtained any identification documents or information from those individuals.  Belair filed currency transaction reports (CTRs) that falsely stated the checks were cashed by the foreign nationals who set up the shell corporations, and in certain CTRs, Belair failed to indicate the full amount of cash provided to the individuals.  The individuals cashed more than $19 million through Belair during the course of the scheme.  Panzera and Belair willfully failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program by cashing these checks.

The charges in the indictment against Panzera’s and Belair’s co-defendants remain pending and are merely accusations.  Those defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

The cases are being investigated by agents from ICE Homeland Security Investigations and IRS-CI.  These cases are being prosecuted by Trial Attorneys Claiborne W. Porter and Kevin G. Mosley of the Criminal Division’s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section’s (AFMLS) Money Laundering and Bank Integrity Unit, Trial Attorney Darrin McCullough of AFMLS’s Forfeiture Unit, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Patricia Notopoulos of the Eastern District of New York.

The Money Laundering and Bank Integrity Unit investigates and prosecutes complex, multi-district and international criminal cases involving financial institutions and individuals who violate the money laundering statutes, the Bank Secrecy Act and other related statutes.  The Unit’s prosecutions generally focus on three types of violators: financial institutions, including their officers, managers and employees, whose actions threaten the integrity of the individual institution or the wider financial system; professional money launderers and gatekeepers who provide their services to serious criminal organizations; and individuals and entities engaged in using the latest and most sophisticated money laundering techniques and tools.

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTOR PLEADS GUILTY TO BID RIGGING AT PUBLIC FORECLOSURE AUCTIONS

WASHINGTON — A Northern California real estate investor pleaded guilty today for his  role in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate  foreclosure auctions in Northern California, the Department of Justice  announced.

Kuo Hsuan “Chuck” Chang, of San Francisco, entered his guilty plea in  U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San  Francisco.  Felony charges were filed  against Chang on Oct. 9, 2013.

Chang is the 37th individual to plead guilty or agree to plead guilty  as a result of the department’s ongoing antitrust investigations  into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in  Northern California.

According to court documents, Chang conspired with others  not to bid against one another, but instead to designate a winning bidder to  obtain selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San  Francisco County, Calif.  Chang was also  charged with conspiring to use the mail to carry out schemes to fraudulently  acquire title to selected properties sold at public auctions, to make and  receive payoffs, and to divert co-conspirators’ money that would have otherwise  gone to mortgage holders and others.  Chang is charged with participating in these conspiracies beginning  as early as October 2009 and continuing until about November 2010.

“The Antitrust Division will continue to vigorously prosecute  anticompetitive schemes that compromise local markets and cause financial harm  to consumers,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the  Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division.   “Collusion at foreclosure auctions harmed both lenders and distressed  homeowners in an already struggling real estate market, and the conspirators  must be held accountable.”

As described in the charging document, the primary purpose of the conspiracies was to suppress and  restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in order to obtain selected real  estate offered at San Francisco County public foreclosure auctions at  non-competitive prices.  When real estate  properties are sold at these auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the  mortgage and other debt attached to the property, with remaining proceeds, if  any, paid to the homeowner.  According  to court documents, these conspirators paid and received money that otherwise  would have gone to pay off the mortgage and other holders of debt secured by  the properties, and, in some cases, the defaulting homeowner.

“We urge anyone with information regarding fraudulent anticompetitive  practices at foreclosure auctions to contact the FBI or our partners at the  Antitrust Division,” said FBI San Francisco Special Agent in Charge David J.  Johnson.  “The FBI will continue to work with our law enforcement partners  and the community to root out and bring to justice those individuals who  undermine the real estate market and victimize legitimate consumers.”

A violation of the  Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million  fine for individuals. The maximum fine for the Sherman Act charges may be increased  to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the  victims if either amount is greater than $1 million. A count of conspiracy to  commit mail fraud carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1  million fine.

The charges against  Chang are the latest filed by the department in its ongoing investigation into  bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San  Francisco, San Mateo, Alameda and Contra Costa counties, Calif.  These investigations are being conducted by  the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San Francisco  Office.  Anyone with information  concerning bid rigging or fraud related to public real estate foreclosure  auctions should  contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco office at 415-436-6660, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.html or call the FBI tip  line at 415-553-7400.

This case was brought  in connection with the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.  The task force was established to wage an  aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute  financial crimes.  With more than 20 federal  agencies, 94 U.S. Attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it is the  broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory agencies  ever assembled to combat fraud.  Since  its formation, the task force has made great strides in facilitating increased  investigation and prosecution of financial crimes; enhancing coordination and  cooperation among federal, state and local authorities; addressing  discrimination in the lending and financial markets and conducting outreach to  the public, victims, financial institutions and other organizations.  Over the past three fiscal years, the Justice  Department has filed nearly 10,000 financial fraud cases against nearly 15,000  defendants, including more than 2,900 mortgage fraud defendants.  For more information on the task force, please  visit  www.StopFraud.gov