Former Shipping Executive Indicted for Role in Price-Fixing Conspiracy Involving Coastal Freight Services Between the Continental United States and Puerto Rico

Posted on by
A federal grand jury in San Juan, Puerto Rico, has returned an indictment against Thomas Farmer, a former executive of Jacksonville, Fla.-based Crowley Liner Services, for participating in a conspiracy to fix rates and surcharges for freight transported by water between the continental United States and Puerto Rico, the Department of Justice announced today.

The indictment, filed today in the U.S. District Court in San Juan, charges Farmer, the former vice president of price and yield management of Crowley, with conspiring with co-conspirators to suppress and eliminate competition by agreeing to fix rates and surcharges for Puerto Rico freight services from at least as early as mid-2005 until at least April 2008.

Crowley transports a variety of cargo shipments, such as heavy equipment, perishable food items, medicines and consumer goods, on scheduled ocean voyages between the continental United States and Puerto Rico.

The indictment alleges, among other things, that Farmer and co-conspirators carried out the conspiracy by attending meetings and engaging in conversations and communications in the continental United States and Puerto Rico to fix, stabilize and maintain rates and surcharges for Puerto Rico freight services; to allocate customers of Puerto Rico freight services between and among the conspirators; and to rig bids submitted to customers of Puerto Rico freight services.

“Today’s indictment charges this executive with participating in a price-fixing conspiracy that affected the cost of shipping many consumer goods to Puerto Rico,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “The division will continue to vigorously pursue individuals who engage in anticompetitive behavior.”

Farmer is charged with price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

As a result of this ongoing investigation, three companies, including Crowley, and six individuals have pleaded guilty or been convicted at trial. Five of the individuals and the three companies have been ordered to serve sentences ranging from seven months to four years in prison and to pay more than $46 million in criminal fines. The sixth individual, Frank Peake, was convicted at trial in January 2013 and is currently scheduled to be sentenced on May 31, 2013.

This case is part of an ongoing federal antitrust investigation into price fixing, bid rigging and other anticompetitive conduct in the coastal water freight transportation industry, which is being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s National Criminal Enforcement Section; the Baltimore Resident Agency of the Department of Defense’s Office of the Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS); the Miami Field Office of the Department of Transportation’s Office of Inspector General; and the Jacksonville Field Office of the FBI. Anyone with information concerning anticompetitive conduct in the coastal water freight transportation industry is urged to call the Antitrust Division’s National Criminal Enforcement Section at 202-307-6694.

Tanzania’s Contract Registration Board Holds First Procurement Fraud Best Practices Workshop With Assistance From GeyerGorey LLP

Posted on by

From February 25 through March 1st 2013, at the Grand Hyatt in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, the Contractors’ Registration Board (CRB) of Tanzania hosted the first in a series of comprehensive multi-day procurement fraud training programs.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRLog (Press Release) – Mar. 21, 2013 – From February 25 through March 1st 2013, at the Grand Hyatt in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, the Contractors’ Registration Board (CRB) of Tanzania hosted the first in a series of comprehensive multi-day procurement fraud training programs.

Chief Executive Officer Bonaface Megage announced that the CRB intended this program to be the beginning of a national procurement fraud initiative established to promote the early detection, prevention and prosecution of procurement fraud associated with increased contracting activity for government programs necessary to support a growing Tanzanian economy.  “In the weeks and months to come, we will be reaching out to other agencies within Tanzania and asking them for their support in our continuing efforts to eliminate fraud from the procurement process,” stated CRB’s Chairman of the Board Consolata Ngimbwa.  “We wanted to create the leading best practices contracting program in our region of the world and that is why we invited business sector leaders in the Tanzanian economy to incorporate their experiences and help us shape a fraud enforcement program that is in parity with other international programs and yet still unique to Tanzania.”
Conceived and coordinated under the capable guidance and supervision of Professor Charles Inyangete, of T-Mortgage Limited, a noted scholar, advisor and consultant on the African continent involving procurement, finance, economic policy, banking and financial risk, the conference incorporated three full days of instruction and included a final day “Master Class” that blended US case hypotheticals with Tanzanian enforcement experience.  “We were immensely pleased with the advice, counsel and three days of instruction provided by Bradford L Geyer (from GeyerGorey LLP, an American law firm based out of New York and Washington D.C. that specializes on international fraud enforcement programs, compliance and white collar defense).  “Mr. Geyer used a five year period of American experience of Overseas Contingency Operations Contracting and compared and contrasted it with the challenges we face here in Tanzania.  While doing so, he familiarized our participants with cutting edge technologies in best contracting practices and compliance that focused on competition, antitrust, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), anti-money laundering, reporting structures, document control and preservation, and risk management.”

CRB Vice Chairman Joseph Tango stated that “[Tanzanians] and the international community are committed to preserving our ethical contracting environment in Tanzania.  We recognize that the companies we need to engage desire to operate in a competitive environment that is predictable, ethical and safe from corruption. This should be a welcome call especially to European and American companies who seek to become responsible business partners in our development efforts, but it is also a warning shot to those who would seek to corrupt and pervert our system.  Currently, our system like every other on the globe faces challenges in this regard, but we stand committed to overcoming these challenges.”

The participants in the first Tanzanian Contract and Procurement Fraud Workshop were selected from inside and outside of Tanzanian government for their expertise, experience and leadership qualities and had agreed by consensus to incorporate the technologies they learned at the conference back to their home offices to share with colleagues.

Security Contractors Plead Guilty in Virginia to Illegally Obtaining $31 Million from Contracts Intended for Disadvantaged Small Businesses

Posted on by
Executives at two Arlington, Va.-based businesses have pleaded guilty to fraudulently obtaining more than $31 million in government contract payments that should have gone to disadvantaged small businesses.

 The guilty pleas were announced today by U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia Neil H. MacBride, Acting Assistant Attorney General Mythili Raman of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and NASA Inspector General Paul K. Martin.

“These executives used their knowledge and experience to abuse a program created to ensure minority small business owners could compete for government contracts,” said U.S. Attorney MacBride. “They not only illegally obtained millions from the United States, they also victimized legitimate minority owners who didn’t get the bids.”

“Keith Hedman and his co-conspirators fraudulently obtained valuable government contracts intended for minority-owned small businesses, and pocketed millions of dollars for themselves,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Raman.  “They abused an important government program, and will now face the consequences.”

“This investigation confirmed that these executives repeatedly took actions that gave them a fraudulent advantage in the contracting process,” said NASA Inspector General Martin.  “I commend the outstanding efforts of our agents and our law enforcement partners involved in this case in protecting the integrity of the 8(a) program.”

According to court documents, Keith Hedman, 53, of Arlington, formed an Arlington-based security service consulting company in approximately 2001.  Hedman formed the company, listed as Company A in court filings, with an African-American woman who was listed as its president and CEO to enable the company to participate in the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Section 8(a) program, which enables certain small businesses to receive sole-source and competitive-bid contracts set aside for minority-owned and disadvantaged small businesses.  In 2001, Hedman’s company received approval to participate in the 8(a) program on the basis of the African-American president and CEO’s listed role, but when she left the company in 2003, Hedman became its sole owner and the company was no longer 8(a)-eligible.

Hedman admitted that in 2003 he created a shell company, listed as Company B in court records, to ensure he could continue to gain access to 8(a) contracting preferences for which Company A was not qualified.  Prior to applying for the shell company’s 8(a) status, Hedman selected an employee, Dawn Hamilton, 48, of Brownsville, Md., to serve as a figurehead owner based on her Portuguese heritage and history of social disadvantage, when in reality the new company would be managed by Hedman and senior leadership at Company A.  To deceive the SBA, they falsely claimed that Hamilton formed and founded the company and that she was the only member of the company’s management.  They continued to mislead the SBA through 2012, even lying to the SBA to overcome a protest filed by another company accusing Hedman’s former company and the shell company of being inappropriately affiliated.

From Company B’s creation through February 2012, Hedman – not Hamilton – exercised ultimate decision-making authority and control over the company by controlling its finances, allocation of personnel and government contracting activities.  Hedman nonetheless maintained the impression that Hamilton was leading the company, including through forgeries of signatures by Hamilton to documents she had not seen or drafted.  Hedman also retained ultimate control over the shell business’s bank accounts throughout its existence.  In 2011, Hedman withdrew $1 million in cash from Company B’s accounts and gave the funds in cash to Hamilton and three other co-conspirators. In total, Hedman and Hamilton secured through the shell company more than $31 million in government contract payments, which generated more than $6 million in salary and payments for the conspirators that they were not entitled to receive.

In addition, Hedman admitted that he agreed to pay a $50,000 bribe through the shell business to a U.S. government contracting official for the official’s help in securing contracts for Company B.

Hedman and Hamilton pleaded guilty on March 13 and March 15, 2013, respectively, in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to major government fraud and face a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a multimillion-dollar fine for that charge. Hedman also pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison.  Hedman agreed to forfeit more than $6.3 million, and Hamilton agreed to forfeit more than $1.2 million.  Hedman is scheduled to be sentenced on June 21, 2013, before U.S. District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee.  Hamilton’s sentencing is scheduled for June 21, 2013, before U.S. District Judge T. S. Ellis, III.

In addition, the following individuals have also pleaded guilty to major fraud or conspiracy to commit major fraud:

• David George Lux, 62, of Springfield, Va., pleaded guilty today before U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema.  Lux served as the chief financial officer at Company A from 2007 through February 2012 and performed work for Company B throughout that time while officially on Company A’s payroll.  He is scheduled to be sentenced on June 14, 2013, by Judge Brinkema.

• Joseph Richards, 51, of Arlington, pleaded guilty on March 14, 2013, before U.S. District Judge Brinkema in the Eastern District of Virginia.  Richards served as the chief operating officer and chief of staff for Company A from 2005 through 2008 and then vice president from 2010 through February 2012.  He also served as Company B’s chief of staff from 2008 through 2010.  According to court documents, Richards performed work for Company B throughout his time at both companies. He is scheduled to be sentenced on June 14, 2013, by Judge Brinkema.

• David Sanborn, 60, of Lexington, S.C., pleaded guilty on March 13, 2013, before U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton in the Eastern District of Virginia.  Sanborn served as vice president at Company A from 2001 through 2009 and the company’s president from 2010 through February 2012.  According to court documents, Sanborn performed work for Company B from its inception while on Company A’s payroll.  He is scheduled to be sentenced on June 28, 2013, by Judge Hilton.

This case was investigated by the NASA Office of the Inspector General (OIG), the SBA OIG, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the General Services Administration OIG and the Department of Homeland Security OIG.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Chad Golder and Ryan Faulconer, a former Trial Attorney for the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, are prosecuting the case on behalf of the United States.

Former U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers Employee Sentenced To 13 Years In Prison For Multimillion-Dollar Bribery, Kickback Scheme

Posted on by

At Least $50 Million in Iraq Construction Contracts Involved

NEWARK, N.J. – A former U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Project Engineer deployed to Tikrit, Iraq, during Operation Iraqi Freedom was sentenced today to 156 months in prison for taking at least $3.7 million in bribes and kickbacks in connection with more than $50 million in USACE contracts awarded to foreign companies in Gulf Region North, Iraq, New Jersey U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman announced.

Egyptian-born U.S. citizen John Alfy Salama Markus, 40, of Nazareth, Pa., previously pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Jose L. Linares to three counts of a 54-count Indictment returned in July 2011 charging him with wire fraud, conspiracy to commit bribery and to defraud the U.S. government, money laundering and tax offenses. Two other USACE employees and two foreign contractors also were charged in the July 2011 Indictment. Judge Linares imposed the sentence today in Newark federal court.

“The Court’s lengthy sentence recognizes the significant harm Salama Markus caused when he corrupted tens of millions in Iraq construction contracts by treating projects to secure safe access to fuel, electricity, education and medical treatment as opportunities for illegally amassing personal wealth,” U.S. Attorney Fishman said. “Bribes should not be the cost of doing business with the United States. They violate our laws and unfairly tarnish those who serve our country with honor.”

“By accepting bribes and corrupting the acquisition process while deployed to a combat theater, Mr. Salama Markus failed in his duty to his country and betrayed his position of trust for personal greed, depriving the U.S. taxpayers of his honest service,” Acting Special Agent in Charge Craig W. Rupert, DCIS Northeast Field Office, said. “The Defense Criminal Investigative Service continues to aggressively root out corruption and fraud impacting our warfighters and to safeguard the proper use of U.S. taxpayer dollars.”

“Today’s sentencing of Salama Markus is a direct result of the excellent relationship IRS has with our law enforcement partners in combating violations of federal law,” Shantelle P. Kitchen, Acting Special Agent in Charge, IRS-Criminal Investigation, Newark Field Office, said. “This sentence should send a clear message: illegally lining your own pocket for personal financial gain will not be tolerated, and individuals like Mr. Markus will be punished for their crimes.”

According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

From July 2007 to June 2008, Salama Markus accepted at least $3.7 million in bribe and kickback payments in connection with USACE contracts awarded to multiple companies associated with two foreign contractors named in the Indictment – Ahmed Nouri, a/k/a “Ahmed Bahjat,” 42, a citizen of Great Britain residing in Greece and Iraq and the former vice president of Operations for Iraqi Consultants & Construction Bureau (“ICCB”); and Mithaq Al-Fahal, a/k/a “Mithaq Mahmood Al-Fahal,” 38, an Iraqi citizen who was a senior project manager at Sakar Al-Fahal and controlled Dar Al Jubori Co. From September 2005 to July 2008, Salama Markus was assigned to Tikrit as a project engineer, where he and his co-worker, Onisem Gomez, were involved in the review and award process for contractors seeking lucrative USACE contracts in Gulf Region North, Iraq, as well as the administration, oversight and modification of such contracts, post-award.

Salama Markus admitted that he devised a scheme to provide favorable official action and assistance to co-conspirators Nouri and Al-Fahal for the benefit of their associated companies, including obtaining and disseminating confidential bid and internal USACE pricing information to individuals seeking the award of USACE contracts to their companies, and approving lucrative payments to these companies. All of these actions were taken in exchange for bribes and kickbacks that Salama Markus accepted from foreign contractors. Salama Markus also admitted paying more than $100,000 in bribe money received by Gomez.

Salama Markus opened or established control over multiple foreign bank accounts in Jordan and Egypt to receive illegal bribe and kickback payments that he took from foreign contractors in connection with USACE contracts awarded. With respect to some of these USACE contracts, Salama Markus created, maintained and sent via email to foreign contractors spreadsheets and other records detailing: (a) the value of USACE contracts awarded; (b) the percentage of those contracts that Salama Markus solicited and demanded; (c) the payments – whether by installment or lump sum – made to Salama Markus by foreign contractors in connection with the award of USACE contracts; and (d) in some cases, the date on which these illegal payments were accepted in cash or deposited into Salama Markus’ foreign bank accounts. A single page of one spreadsheet created by Salama Markus in July 2008 reflected his demand and acceptance of bribe payments totaling $1,958,500, or 10 percent of the contract value, from co-conspirator Al-Fahal in connection with the award to companies associated with Al-Fahal of $19,580,000 in contracts for the construction of segments of the Baghdad to Bayji Pipeline.

Salama Markus used the foreign bank accounts under his control to receive and transfer bribe and kickback payments from foreign contractors to at least 11 bank accounts opened, established and controlled by Salama Markus in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Salama Markus also transferred bribe and kickback money to co-conspirator Gomez.

Salama Markus admitted that with the proceeds of his wire fraud scheme and bribery offenses he paid for the construction of a custom-built home in Nazareth, which was worth $1.1 million. He admitted that on Oct. 16, 2008, the date of settlement, he obtained a cashier’s check drawn on a Bank of America account for $850,807.54 made out to a title company in connection with the construction of the Nazareth home.

Salama Markus also admitted that, for calendar year 2009, he failed to file with the U.S. Department of Treasury a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), disclosing that he had a financial interest in, and signature and other authority over, certain financial accounts in foreign countries, including Jordan.

Salama Markus agreed to the entry of a forfeiture money judgment in the amount of at least $3.7 million, a portion of which will be satisfied by his forfeiture of the Nazareth residence, as well as his forfeiture of five vehicles and two motorcycles.

In addition to the prison term, Judge Linares sentenced Salama Markus to three years of supervised release, fined him $75,000 and ordered him to cooperate with the IRS concerning the payment of taxes and penalties.

U.S. Attorney Fishman credited special agents of DCIS, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Craig W. Rupert, Acting Special Agent-in-Charge of the Northeast Field Office of the U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service; IRS-Criminal Investigation, under the direction of Acting Special Agent in Charge Shantelle P. Kitchen with the investigation leading to today’s sentence. He also thanked special agents of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Andrew McLees; and the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, Mid-Atlantic Fraud Field Office, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge William J. Stakes Jr., for their work in the ongoing investigation.

The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sandra L. Moser and Vikas Khanna of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Special Prosecutions Division in Newark.

New York-Based Corning Incorporated to Pay U.S. $5.65 Million to Resolve False Claims Allegations

Posted on by
Corning Incorporated has agreed to pay the U nited States $5.65 million to resolve claims that it knowingly presented false claims to the United States for laboratory research products sold to federal agencies through Corning’s Life Sciences division.   Corning, a New York based corporation, creates and makes glass and ceramic components for consumer electronics, mobile emissions controls, telecommunications and life sciences.

 

The settlement resolves claims relating to a contract entered into by Corning in 2005 to sell laboratory research products to federal government entities through the General Services Administration’s (GSA) Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) program.   The MAS program provides the government and other General Services Administration authorized purchasers with a streamlined process for procurement of commonly-used commercial goods and services. To be awarded a MAS contract, and thereby gain access to the broad government marketplace and the ease of administration that comes from selling to hundreds of government purchasers under one central contract, contractors must agree to disclose commercial pricing policies and practices, and to abide by the contract terms.

The settlement resolves allegations that, in contract negotiations and over the course of the contract’s administration, Corning knowingly failed to meet its contractual obligations to provide GSA with current, accurate and complete information about its commercial sales practices, including discounts offered to other customers, and that Corning knowingly made false statements to GSA about its sales practices and discounts .   The settlement further resolves allegations that Corning knowingly failed to comply with the price reduction clause of its GSA contract by failing to disclose to GSA discounts Corning gave to its commercial customers when they were higher than the discounts that Corning had disclosed to GSA, and by failing to pass those discounts on to government customers.   The United States alleged that, because of these improper dealings, it received lower discounts and ultimately paid far more than it should have for Corning products.

“This settlement shows that the United States expects all contractors participating in the MAS program to make full and accurate disclosures of their commercial pricing practices to the GSA and to act in good faith when dealing with the United States government,” said Stuart F. Delery, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Department of Justice’s Civil Division.   “The failure to make full and accurate disclosures material to the government’s contracting processes will not be tolerated.”

 “At a time when our political leaders are making tough choices about how to rein in federal spending, government contractors need to understand that they will not get away with overbilling the taxpayer,” said U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ronald C. Machen Jr.  “Companies that want to take advantage of federal contracts are obligated to deal openly and fairly with their government customers.  When contractors fail to meet their obligations, we will hold them accountable and seek to make the taxpayer whole.”

“Contractors need to be honest and follow through with their promises to the federal government – or pay the consequences,” said Brian D. Miller, Inspector General for the General Services Administration.

The settlement resolves a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by a former Corning Life Sciences sales representative Kevin Jones under the qui tam, or whistleblower provisions, of the False Claims Act.   Under the Act, private citizens may bring suit for false claims on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery obtained by the government.   Mr. Jones will receive $904,000 as his share of the government’s recovery.

 

This settlement was the result of a coordinated effort by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia; the Department of Justice, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch; and the GSA’s Office of Inspector General in investigating the allegations in this case.   The claims settled by this agreement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

Two Japanese Freight Forwarding Companies Agree To Plead Guilty To Criminal Price-Fixing Charges

Posted on by

Companies Agree to Pay a Total of $18.9 Million in Criminal Fines

WASHINGTON — Two Japanese air freight forwarding companies have agreed to plead guilty and to pay criminal fines totaling $18.9 million for their roles in a conspiracy to fix certain fees in connection with the provision of air freight forwarding services for air cargo shipments from Japan to the United States, the Department of Justice announced today. “K” Line Logistics Ltd. has agreed to pay a $3,507,246 criminal fine and Yusen Logistics Co. Ltd. has agreed to pay a $15,428,207 criminal fine.

Including today’s charges, as a result of this investigation, 16 companies have either pleaded guilty or agreed to plead guilty and have agreed to pay criminal fines totaling more than $120 million.

“Consumers were forced to pay higher prices on the goods they buy every day as a result of the noncompetitive and collusive service fees charged by these companies,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “Prosecuting these kinds of global, price-fixing conspiracies continues to be a top priority of the Antitrust Division.”

Freight forwarders manage the domestic and international delivery of cargo for customers by receiving, packaging, preparing and warehousing cargo freight, arranging for cargo shipment through transportation providers such as air carriers, preparing shipment documentation and providing related ancillary services.

According to charges filed separately today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, “K” Line Logistics and Yusen Logistics engaged in a conspiracy to fix and to impose certain freight forwarding service fees, including fuel surcharges and various security fees, charged to customers for services provided in connection with air freight forwarding shipments of cargo shipped by air from Japan to the United States from about September 2002 until at least November 2007.

According to the charges, the companies carried out the conspiracy by, among other things, agreeing during meetings and discussions to coordinate and impose certain freight forwarding service fees and charges on customers purchasing freight forwarding services for cargo shipped by air from Japan to the United States. The department said the companies levied freight forwarding service fees in accordance with the agreements reached and engaged in meetings and discussions for the purpose of monitoring and enforcing adherence to the agreed-upon freight forwarding service fees.

Each company is charged with price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum $100 million fine for corporations. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

Today’s charges are the result of a joint investigation being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s National Criminal Enforcement Section, the FBI’s Washington Field Office and the Department of Commerce’s Office of Inspector General. Anyone with information concerning the price fixing or other anticompetitive conduct in the freight forwarding industry is urged to call the Antitrust Division’s National Criminal Enforcement Section at 202-307-6694 or visit www.justice.gov/atr/contract/newcase.htm or call the FBI’s Washington Field Office at 202-278-2000.

Two Hungarian Nationals Sentenced in Tennessee for Roles in International Fraud Scheme Involving Online Marketplace Websites

Posted on by
Hungarian nationals Beatrix Boka and Aleksandar Kunkin were sentenced today to serve 36 months and 48 months in prison, respectively, for their roles in moving approximately $550,000 in illicit proceeds derived from an international online marketplace fraud scheme, announced Acting Assistant Attorney General Mythili Raman of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Jerry E. Martin for the Middle District of Tennessee.

Boka, 34, and Kunkin, 40, were sentenced by U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger in the Middle District of Tennessee.  In addition to their prison terms, Boka and Kunkin were each sentenced to serve two years of supervised release and ordered to pay $464,581 in restitution.

Boka and Kunkin each pleaded guilty in November 2012 to one count of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud.

According to testimony at Boka and Kunkin’s plea hearings, members of the conspiracy fraudulently listed vehicles for sale at online marketplaces such as eBay. When victims expressed interest in purchasing the vehicles, co-conspirators sent emails that directed the victims to wire payments to certain bank accounts, and victims never received the vehicles for which they paid.  From May to June 2012, Boka and Kunkin visited Bank of America branches in North Carolina and South Carolina and opened bank accounts under false identities, which were supported by fraudulent identity documents including counterfeit Hungarian passports.  In total, 36 victims sent approximately $550,102 to accounts opened by Boka and Kunkin.  Boka and Kunkin subsequently sent the bulk of the money to co-conspirators located abroad.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Byron M. Jones of the Middle District of Tennessee and Trial Attorney Mysti Degani of the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section.  The case is being investigated by the FBI, the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department and the Cobb County, Ga., Sheriff’s Department.

Two Northern California Real Estate Investors Agree to Plead Guilty to Bid Rigging at Public Foreclosure Auctions

Posted on by
29 Individuals Have Agreed to Plead Guilty to Date

WASHINGTON – Two Northern California real estate investors have agreed to plead guilty for their role in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California, the Department of Justice announced.

Felony charges were filed today in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in Oakland against Peter McDonough of Pleasanton, Calif., and Michael Renquist of Livermore, Calif.

Including today’s pleas, 29 individuals have pleaded guilty or agreed to plead guilty as a result of the department’s ongoing antitrust investigation into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California.

According to court documents, for various lengths of time between November 2008 and January 2011, McDonough and Renquist conspired with others not to bid against one another, but instead designated a winning bidder to obtain selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Alameda County, Calif . McDonough and Renquist were also charged with a conspiracy to use the mail to carry out a scheme to fraudulently acquire title to selected Alameda County properties sold at public auctions, to make and receive payoffs and to divert money to co-conspirators that would have gone to mortgage holders and others by holding second, private auctions open only to members of the conspiracy. The department said that the selected properties were then awarded to the conspirators who submitted the highest bids in the second, private auctions. The private auctions often took place at or near the courthouse steps where the public auctions were held. Renquist was also charged with additional counts for his involvement in similar conduct in Contra Costa County, Calif.

“The conspirators suppressed competition and lined their pockets through fraudulent and collusive conduct at the expense of lenders and distressed homeowners,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “The Antitrust Division and its law enforcement partners at the FBI will continue to hold accountable individuals who subvert the competitive process at foreclosure auctions around the country.”

The department said that the primary purpose of the conspiracies was to suppress and restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in order to obtain selected real estate offered at Alameda and Contra Costa County public foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices. When real estate properties are sold at these auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the mortgage and other debt attached to the property, with remaining proceeds, if any, paid to the homeowner. According to court documents, the conspirators paid and received money that otherwise would have gone to pay off the mortgage and other holders of debt secured by the properties, and, in some cases, the defaulting homeowner.

“The FBI and the Antitrust Division continue to bring to justice those individuals who engage in fraudulent anticompetitive practices at foreclosure actions,” said David J. Johnson, FBI Special Agent in Charge of the San Francisco Field Office.   “The foundation of our real estate market depends on fairness and transparency of all participants, and we are committed to working with our local and federal partners to ensure that conspirators are held accountable.”

A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals. The maximum fine for the Sherman Act charges may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims if either amount is greater than $1 million. A count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The government can also seek to forfeit the proceeds earned from participating in the conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

The charges today are the latest filed by the department in its ongoing investigation into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa and Alameda counties, Calif. These investigations are being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San Francisco office. Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or frau d related to public real estate foreclosure auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Field Office at 415-436-6660, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm, or call the FBI tip line at 415-553-7400.

Today’s case was done in connection with the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. The task force was established to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. With more than 20 federal agencies, 94 U.S. attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it’s the broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory agencies ever assembled to combat fraud. Since its formation, the task force has made great strides in facilitating increased investigation and prosecution of financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among federal, state and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending and financial markets and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial institutions and other organizations. Over the past three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed nearly 10,000 financial fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants including more than 2,900 mortgage fraud defendants. For more information on the task force, please visit www.StopFraud.gov .

CIA Contractors Settle False Claims Act and Kickback Allegations for $3 Million United States Alleges Companies Provided Government Employees with Meals and Entertainment to Steer Contract Award

Posted on by
The Justice Department announced today that American Systems Corporation,  International Inc., and Corning Cable Systems LLC have agreed to pay the United States $3 million to settle allegations that they violated the False Claims Act and the Anti-Kickback Act in bidding on a contract with the CIA.

The settlement announced today resolves claims against these contractors related to a CIA contract awarded to American Systems in early 2009 to provide supplies and services.  American Systems teamed with Anixter to bid on the contract with Corning as a supplier.   The United States alleged that American Systems, Anixter and Corning provided gratuities, including meals, entertainment, gifts and tickets to sporting and other events, to CIA employees and outside consultants in order to influence contract specifications that would favor the three companies in the award of the contract. The settlement also resolves allegations that the three companies improperly received source selection information from a CIA employee to whom they had provided gratuities, and that they had concealed the gratuities prior to award.

“This settlement shows that the United States will protect the integrity of the federal procurement process from the wrongful activities of unscrupulous contractors,” said Stuart F. Delery, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Department of Justice, Civil Division.   “Plying government officials with meals and entertainment to gain favorable treatment in the award of federal contracts corrupts the procurement process and will not be allowed.”  

 “Improper gifts and gratuities paid to government officials are a corrupting influence on government contracts. Combating this type of conduct is a high priority in the Eastern District of Virginia,” said U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia Neil MacBride.

“This case clearly reflects that the CIA will respond effectively to allegations of fraud affecting agency programs,” said CIA Inspector General David B. Buckley. “My office treats contract fraud and related employee misconduct as one of our top investigative priorities, and we work closely with agency employees and the Department of Justice to ensure that illegal acts are addressed in an effective manner.”

The allegations resolved by the settlement were initiated by a lawsuit filed in the Eastern District of Virginia under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act by former Anixter sales representative, William Jones. Under the False Claims Act, private citizens may sue on behalf of the United States for false claims and share in any recovery obtained by the government. Jones will receive $585,000 as his share of the government’s recovery.

This settlement was the result of a coordinated effort by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia; the Department of Justice, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch; and the CIA, Office of Inspector General. The claims settled by this agreement are allegations only; there has been no determination of liability.

Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc. Pleads Guilty, Admits Misbranding Of Megace® Es

Posted on by

Agrees to Pay $45M to Resolve Criminal and Civil Investigations

NEWARK, N.J. – New Jersey-based Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc. (“Par”) pleaded guilty in federal court today and agreed to pay $45 million to resolve its criminal and civil liability in the company’s promotion of its prescription drug Megace® ES for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and not covered by federal health care programs, the Justice Department announced.

Chief Executive Officer Paul V. Campanelli pleaded guilty on behalf of Par before U.S. Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo earlier today in Newark federal court. Judge Arleo imposed sentence today, fining Par $18 million and ordering $4.5 million in criminal forfeiture. Par also agreed to pay $22.5 million to resolve its civil liability.

“The FDA requires drug makers to go through a stringent approval process before new drugs – or new uses for existing drugs – are made available to doctors and their patients,” U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman said. “Today, Par admitted that it chose to ignore that process in pursuit of more sales and greater profits. It is paying the price for its choice.”

“Today’s resolution emphasizes the importance of the U.S. government’s coordinated efforts to combat health care fraud. We expect companies to make honest, lawful claims about the drugs they sell. We will be vigorous in our enforcement efforts when they break the law, to ensure that they are held accountable,” said Stuart F. Delery, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

“Individual accountability of Par’s board and executives is required under the comprehensive five-year integrity agreement OIG has with the company,” said Daniel R. Levinson, Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  “For example, company executives may have to forfeit annual bonuses if they or their subordinates engage in significant misconduct, and sales representatives may not be paid incentive compensation for the drug involved in the case, or successor branded versions of that drug.”

“The public has been well served by this investigation and the FDA commends the efforts of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey, the Department of Justice and the other law enforcement agencies that worked with us to vigorously pursue this matter,” said Mark Dragonetti, Special Agent In Charge of the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigation’s New York Field Office. “Today’s settlement demonstrates the FDA’s continued commitment to target companies that disregard the safeguards of the drug approval process and promote drugs for uses before they have been proven to be safe and effective.”

Par pleaded guilty to an Information charging it with a criminal misdemeanor for misbranding Megace® ES in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). Megace® ES, a megestrol acetate drug product, was approved by the FDA to treat anorexia, cachexia, or other significant weight loss suffered by patients with AIDS (the “AIDS Indication”). The Megace® ES distributed nationwide by Par was criminally misbranded because its FDA-approved labeling lacked adequate directions for use in the treatment of non-AIDS-related geriatric wasting, a use that was intended by Par but never approved by the FDA. The FDCA requires companies such as Par to specify the intended uses of a product in an application to the FDA. Once approved, a drug may not be distributed in interstate commerce for unapproved or “off-label” uses until the company receives FDA approval for the new intended uses. In addition to the criminal fine and forfeiture, the plea agreement mandates that Par implement several compliance measures and annually provide the U.S. Attorney’s Office with a sworn certification from its chief executive officer that the company has not unlawfully marketed any of its pharmaceutical products.

The civil settlement agreement requires Par to pay $22.5 million to the federal government and various states to resolve claims arising from its off-label marketing. The civil settlement resolves allegations that Par, by promoting the sale and use of Megace® ES for uses that were not FDA-approved and not covered by Federal health care programs, caused false claims to be submitted to these programs. The United States further alleged that Par deliberately and improperly targeted sales to elderly nursing home residents with weight loss, whether or not such patients suffered from AIDS, and launched a long-term care sales force to market to this population. During this marketing campaign, Par was allegedly aware of adverse side effects associated with the use of megestrol acetate in elderly patients, including an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis, toxic reactions in elderly patients with impaired renal function, and mortality. The United States alleged that Par made unsubstantiated and misleading representations about the superiority of Megace® ES over generic megestrol acetate for elderly patients to encourage providers to switch patients from generic megestrol acetate to Megace® ES, despite having conducted no well-controlled studies to support a claim of greater efficacy for Megace® ES. Except as admitted in the plea agreement, the claims settled by the civil settlement agreement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability as to those claims.

In addition to the criminal and civil resolutions, Par also agreed to enter into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS-OIG”) that requires enhanced accountability, increased transparency, and wide-ranging monitoring activities conducted by both internal and independent external reviewers.

The plea agreement and CIA include provisions that require Par to implement changes to the way it does business.  The plea agreement and CIA prohibit Par from providing compensation to sales representatives or their managers based on the volume of sale of Megace ES, and in the CIA, based on the volume of Megace ES and any branded successor megestrol acetate drug.  Under the CIA, Par is also required to change its executive compensation program to permit the company to recoup annual bonuses from covered executives if they, or their subordinates, engage in significant misconduct.

The settlement resolves three lawsuits filed under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private parties to file suit on behalf of the United States and obtain a portion of the government’s recovery. The civil lawsuits were filed in the District of New Jersey and are captioned U.S. ex rel. McKeen and Combs v. Par Pharmaceutical, et al., U.S. ex rel. Thompson v. Par Pharmaceutical, et al., and U.S. ex rel. Elliott & Lundstrom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Par Pharmaceutical, et al. As part of today’s resolution, relators McKeen and Combs will receive $4.4 million.

This resolution is part of the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud and another step for the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) initiative, which was announced by Attorney General Eric Holder and Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services in May 2009. The partnership between the two departments has focused efforts to reduce and prevent Medicare and Medicaid financial fraud through enhanced cooperation. One of the most powerful tools in that effort is the False Claims Act, which the Justice Department has used to recover more than $10.2 billion since January 2009 in cases involving fraud against federal health care programs. The Justice Department’s total recoveries in False Claims Act cases since January 2009 are over $14.1 billion.

History of Megace® ES and Par’s Failed Attempts to Obtain FDA Approval 
of a Geriatric Wasting Indication for Megace® ES

According to the Information, a drug named Megace® OS – a predecessor to Megace® ES – was approved by the FDA in 1993 for the AIDS Indication. Between 2002 and 2005, Par’s market research showed that practitioners prescribed Megace® OS 1 for uses that were inconsistent with the approved labeling, including geriatric weight loss, and that the overwhelming majority of Megace® OS prescriptions were written for such off-label uses.

In 2002, Par first approached the FDA and discussed the company’s plan to seek approval of a new formulation of Megace® OS as a treatment option for geriatric patients with malnutrition. Par did not thereafter seek approval for that patient population. Instead, in June 2004, Par relied on the Megace® OS safety and effectiveness data in seeking approval for Megace® ES for the AIDS indication, i.e., the same indication as Megace® OS. Less than two months after the FDA approved Megace® ES for the AIDS indication, Par requested a meeting with the FDA to discuss Par’s intent to seek approval of Megace® ES for certain non-AIDS geriatric patients. Par never sought approval for that patient population, nor did Par ever conduct drug trials in the geriatric population.

Par’s “Conversion” Strategy, False Superiority Claims, and Promotion of 
Megace® ES for Geriatric Wasting

Despite knowing that Megace® ES had a limited market for its approved use, Par set aggressive sales goals for the product launch. After failing to attain these goals, Par adopted and implemented a marketing strategy designed to promote Megace® ES to geriatric wasting patients – the same population Par had twice discussed with the FDA. Par devised sales call panels which required Par sales representatives to market Megace® ES in nursing homes, as well as to practitioners who treated geriatric patients. These call panels identified physicians with the highest number of Megace® OS prescriptions as the top targets to “convert” from the old Megace® OS to Par’s Megace® ES product. Some Par sales managers required that their subordinates visit 10 to15 nursing homes a week to promote Megace® ES, and told them there would be possible employment consequences, including termination, if they did not promote Megace® ES in nursing homes.

While targeting an audience of health care practitioners that treated the elderly or geriatric population, Par promoted Megace® ES by making false and/or misleading claims that Megace® ES was superior to Megace® OS, including:

  1. Despite having no clinical support for the claim, Par sales representatives promoted Megace® ES as more effective than Megace® OS;
  2. Despite having no clinical support for the claim, Par sales representatives claimed that Megace® ES worked faster and was more effective than other products, and used the phrase “speed and ease” to promote Megace® ES;
  3. Par sales representatives were taught to try and “flip” a nursing home by asking the homes to convert all Megace® OS patients in the nursing home to Megace® ES, despite knowing that the nursing homes contained very few, if any, AIDS patients and the requested patients would therefore be using the product for off-label purposes;
  4. Par trained and directed its sales force to minimize or eliminate mentioning altogether the FDA-approved indication for Megace® ES during promotional sales calls, so as to draw as little attention as possible to the fact that Megace® ES was not approved for geriatric wasting; and
  5. Par managers trained, directed, and encouraged their sales representatives to ask health care practitioners for patient information protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), so that the representatives could request that certain patients who were using Megace® OS be switched to Megace® ES.

U.S. Attorney Fishman said the corporate guilty plea, the civil settlement, and the corporate integrity agreement are the culmination of a multi-year investigation conducted jointly by special agents from HHS-OIG, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Tom O’Donnell, special agents from FDA-OIG, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Mark Dragonetti, and criminal investigators and paralegals with the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

U.S. Attorney Fishman thanked the Defense Criminal Investigative Service; the Office of Personnel Management-Office of Inspector General; the Department of Veterans’ Affairs Office of Inspector General; and TRICARE Program Integrity for assisting in the investigation. He also thanked the National Association of Medicaid Fraud Control Units (NAMFCU), with assistance from the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit of the Ohio Attorney General’s Office for their help in coordinating the settlements with the various states.

The government is represented in the prosecution of the criminal case by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Mack of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Health Care and Government Fraud Unit and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Shannon M. Singleton from the FDA’s Office of Chief Counsel.  Paralegals Jeffrey Skonieczny and Doug Minotti with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Trial Attorney David Frank of the Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch assisted on the criminal side of the case. The government is represented in the civil settlement by Assistant U.S. Attorney David Dauenheimer and Trial Attorney Eva Gunasekera from the Department of Justice’s Commercial Litigation Branch. The corporate integrity agreement was negotiated by Christina McGarvey and Gregory Lindquist from the Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Inspector General.

U.S. Attorney Fishman reorganized the health care fraud practice at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of New Jersey, including creating a stand-alone Health Care and Government Fraud Unit, which handles both criminal and civil investigations and prosecutions of health care fraud offenses. Since 2010, the Office has recovered more than $500 million in health care fraud and government fraud settlements, judgments, fines, restitution, and forfeiture under the False Claims Act, the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, and other statutes.