Category Archives: Antitrust Division

SIX INVESTORS INDICTED FOR THEIR ROLES IN BID RIGGING SCHEME AT MUNICIPAL TAX LIEN AUCTIONS IN NEW JERSEY

Posted on by

Investigation Has Yielded 20 Charges to Date

WASHINGTON — A federal grand jury in Newark,  N.J., returned an indictment against six investors for their roles in a  conspiracy to rig bids at auctions conducted by New Jersey municipalities for  the sale of tax liens, the Department of Justice announced.

The indictment, filed today in U.S.  District Court for the District of New Jersey in Newark, charges four  individuals, Joseph Wolfson, Gregg Gehring, James Jeffers Jr. and Robert Jeffrey, and two entities, Betty Simon Trustee LLC and Richard Simon Trustee, with participating in a conspiracy to rig bids at tax lien auctions in New  Jersey.  According to the indictment, from at least as early as 1998 and continuing until as late as February 2009,  the investors participated in a conspiracy to rig bids at auctions for the sale of municipal tax liens in New Jersey by agreeing to allocate among certain  bidders which liens each would bid on.  The  indictment alleges that the investors proceeded to submit bids in accordance with the agreements and purchased tax liens at collusive and non-competitive interest rates.

Joseph Wolfson, of Margate, N.J., was  a part-owner of two entities that invested in municipal tax liens, Betty Simon  Trustee and Richard Simon Trustee, both of Northfield, N.J.  Gregg Gehring, of Newton, N.J., was employed  by a major tax lien investment company as a vice president.  James Jeffers Jr., of Burlington, N.J., was a  bidder for Crusader Servicing Corp., which pleaded guilty to its role in the  conspiracy in September 2012, and also a bidder for Crusader’s successor  corporation. Robert Jeffrey, of  Bradenton, Fla., was a bidder for both Crusader and its successor corporation.

“The individuals and entities  charged today demonstrated a blatant disregard for the competitive process by  allocating the purchase of certain municipal tax liens by, from time to time,  flipping a coin, drawing numbers out of a hat or drawing from a deck of cards,”  said Leslie C. Overton, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust  Division.  “The Antitrust Division  remains committed to prosecuting those who thwart the competitive bidding  process.”

The department said that the  primary purpose of the conspiracy was to suppress and restrain competition in  order to obtain selected municipal tax liens offered at public auctions at  non-competitive interest rates.  When the  owner of real property fails to pay taxes on that property, the municipality in  which the property is located may attach a lien for the amount of the unpaid  taxes.  If the taxes remain unpaid after  a waiting period, the lien may be sold at auction.  State law requires that investors bid on the interest  rate delinquent property owners will pay upon redemption.  By law, the bid opens at 18 percent interest  and, through a competitive bidding process, can be driven down to zero percent.   If a lien remains unpaid after a certain  period of time, the investor who purchased the lien may begin foreclosure  proceedings against the property to which the lien is attached.  Since the conspiracy permitted the  conspirators to purchase tax liens with limited competition, each conspirator  was able to obtain liens which earned a higher interest rate.  Property owners were therefore made to pay  higher interest on their tax debts than they would have paid had their liens  been purchased in open and honest competition, the department said.

The indictment alleges, among other  things, that from at least as early as 1998 and continuing until as late as  February 2009, prior to the commencement of certain tax lien auctions in New  Jersey, the investors and their co-conspirators agreed not to compete for the  purchase of certain municipal tax liens.

A violation of the Sherman Act  carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for  individuals.  The maximum fine for a  Sherman Act violation may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime  or twice the loss suffered by the victim if either amount is greater than the  $1 million statutory maximum.

Including today’s charges, 20  individuals and entities have been charged as part of an ongoing investigation  into bid rigging or fraud related to municipal tax lien auctions in New Jersey.   To date, 11 individuals – Isadore H.  May, Richard J. Pisciotta Jr., William A. Collins, Robert W. Stein, David M.  Farber, Robert E. Rothman, Stephen E. Hruby, David Butler, Norman T. Remick,  Robert U. Del Vecchio Sr., and Michael Mastellone – and three companies, DSBD  LLC, Crusader Servicing Corp., and Mercer S.M.E. Inc., have pleaded guilty aspart of this investigation.

Today’s charge is part of efforts  underway by President Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force (FFETF)  which was created in November  2009 to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and  prosecute financial crimes.  With more  than 20 federal agencies, 94 U.S. attorneys’ offices and state and local  partners, it’s the broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and  regulatory agencies ever assembled to combat fraud.  Since its formation, the task force has made  great strides in facilitating increased investigation and prosecution of  financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among federal, state  and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending and financial  markets; and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial institutions  and other organizations.  Over the past  three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed more than 10,000 financial  fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants, including more than 2,700  mortgage fraud defendants.  For more information on the task force, visit www.stopfraud.gov.

This ongoing investigation is being conducted by the Antitrust  Division’s New York Field Office and the FBI’s Atlantic City, N.J., office.  Anyone with information concerning bid rigging  or fraud related to municipal tax lien auctions should contact the  Antitrust Division’s New York Field Office at 212-335-8000, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm  or contact the Atlantic City Resident Agency of the FBI at 609-677-6400.

Antitrust Division Tax Lien Initiative Continues…

Posted on by

SIX INVESTORS INDICTED FOR THEIR ROLES IN BID RIGGING SCHEME AT
MUNICIPAL TAX LIEN AUCTIONS IN NEW JERSEY

Investigation Has Yielded 20 Charges to Date

WASHINGTON — A federal grand jury in Newark, N.J., returned an indictment against six investors for their roles in a conspiracy to rig bids at auctions conducted by New Jersey municipalities for the sale of tax liens, the Department of Justice announced.

The indictment, filed today in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in Newark, charges four individuals, Joseph Wolfson, Gregg Gehring, James Jeffers Jr. and Robert Jeffrey, and two entities, Betty Simon Trustee LLC and Richard Simon Trustee, with participating in a conspiracy to rig bids at tax lien auctions in New Jersey.  According to the indictment, from at least as early as 1998 and continuing until as late as February 2009, the investors participated in a conspiracy to rig bids at auctions for the sale of municipal tax liens in New Jersey by agreeing to allocate among certain bidders which liens each would bid on.  The indictment alleges that the investors proceeded to submit bids in accordance with the agreements and purchased tax liens at collusive and non-competitive interest rates.

Joseph Wolfson, of Margate, N.J., was a part-owner of two entities that invested in municipal tax liens, Betty Simon Trustee and Richard Simon Trustee, both of Northfield, N.J.  Gregg Gehring, of Newton, N.J., was employed by a major tax lien investment company as a vice president.  James Jeffers Jr., of Burlington, N.J., was a bidder for Crusader Servicing Corp., which pleaded guilty to its role in the conspiracy in September 2012, and also a bidder for Crusader’s successor corporation. Robert Jeffrey, of Bradenton, Fla., was a bidder for both Crusader and its successor corporation.

“The individuals and entities charged today demonstrated a blatant disregard for the competitive process by allocating the purchase of certain municipal tax liens by, from time to time, flipping a coin, drawing numbers out of a hat or drawing from a deck of cards,” said Leslie C. Overton, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division.  “The Antitrust Division remains committed to prosecuting those who thwart the competitive bidding process.”

The department said that the primary purpose of the conspiracy was to suppress and restrain competition in order to obtain selected municipal tax liens offered at public auctions at non-competitive interest rates.  When the owner of real property fails to pay taxes on that property, the municipality in which the property is located may attach a lien for the amount of the unpaid taxes.  If the taxes remain unpaid after a waiting period, the lien may be sold at auction.  State law requires that investors bid on the interest rate delinquent property owners will pay upon redemption.  By law, the bid opens at 18 percent interest and, through a competitive bidding process, can be driven down to zero percent.  If a lien remains unpaid after a certain period of time, the investor who purchased the lien may begin foreclosure proceedings against the property to which the lien is attached.  Since the conspiracy permitted the conspirators to purchase tax liens with limited competition, each conspirator was able to obtain liens which earned a higher interest rate.  Property owners were therefore made to pay higher interest on their tax debts than they would have paid had their liens been purchased in open and honest competition, the department said.

The indictment alleges, among other things, that from at least as early as 1998 and continuing until as late as February 2009, prior to the commencement of certain tax lien auctions in New Jersey, the investors and their co-conspirators agreed not to compete for the purchase of certain municipal tax liens.

A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals.  The maximum fine for a Sherman Act violation may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victim if either amount is greater than the $1 million statutory maximum.

Including today’s charges, 20 individuals and entities have been charged as part of an ongoing investigation into bid rigging or fraud related to municipal tax lien auctions in New Jersey.  To date, 11 individuals – Isadore H. May, Richard J. Pisciotta Jr., William A. Collins, Robert W. Stein, David M. Farber, Robert E. Rothman, Stephen E. Hruby, David Butler, Norman T. Remick, Robert U. Del Vecchio Sr., and Michael Mastellone – and three companies, DSBD LLC, Crusader Servicing Corp., and Mercer S.M.E. Inc., have pleaded guilty aspart of this investigation.

Today’s charge is part of efforts underway by President Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force (FFETF) which was created in November 2009 to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.  With more than 20 federal agencies, 94 U.S. attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it’s the broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory agencies ever assembled to combat fraud.  Since its formation, the task force has made great strides in facilitating increased investigation and prosecution of financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among federal, state and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending and financial markets; and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial institutions and other organizations.  Over the past three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed more than 10,000 financial fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants, including more than 2,700 mortgage fraud defendants.  For more information on the task force, visit www.stopfraud.gov.

This ongoing investigation is being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s New York Field Office and the FBI’s Atlantic City, N.J., office.  Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to municipal tax lien auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s New York Field Office at 212-335-8000, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm or contact the Atlantic City Resident Agency of the FBI at 609-677-6400.

 

Interview with Susan Crawford on Telecom Competition and her book ‘Captive Audience’

Posted on by

Interview with Susan Crawford on Telecom Competition and her book ‘Captive Audience’

 

 

Start: November 22, 2013 Friday 12:15 PM
End: November 22, 2013 Friday 1:15 PM

Description
free event, registration is required.Please RSVP to [email protected].

Please note: You are not providing your information to the D.C. Bar, but to an organizer for this program.

Professor Susan Crawford and an expert panel will discuss her book, “Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry and Monopoly Power in the New Gilded Age.” The book describes an internet service market with Comcast and a handful of other cable companies each dominating large geographic regions for wired service and with AT&T and Verizon dominating wireless service. Dominant cable companies also control important content, so there is potential to throttle independent providers of television content such as movies and sports.

 

 

This teleconference is sponsored by the Antitrust and Consumer Law Section, in cosponsorship with the American Antitrust Institute.

**This program is offered in a live teleconference format.

Please note: Teleconference information will be e-mailed to registrants 24 hours prior to the event.

 

Location
Teleconference Only
Washington DC 20005
Contact
Sections Office 202-626-3463
Speakers
Susan Crawford, Professor, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Fellow, Roosevelt Institute, co-director, Berkman Center
Bert Foer, President and Founder, American Antitrust Institute
Allen Grunes, Partner, Geyer Gorey LLP, Washington, DC
Don Resnikoff, Attorney, Law Offices of Don Resnikoff, Washington, DC
CLE Credit
No
Cost
**This is a free event, see above for RSVP $0.00

http://mobile.dcbar.org/courses/details.cfm?eventCD=021407GEN&position=5-19

Experts See Inconsistencies in DOJ’s Merger Deal with Airlines

Posted on by

GeyerGorey LLP’s Maurice Stucke provides analysis of Airlines Merger challenge with the Wall Street Journal:

Experts See Inconsistencies in DOJ’s Merger Deal with Airlines

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT REQUIRES US AIRWAYS AND AMERICAN AIRLINES TO DIVEST FACILITIES AT SEVEN KEY AIRPORTS TO ENHANCE SYSTEM-WIDE COMPETITION AND SETTLE MERGER CHALLENGE

Posted on by

Divestitures at Airports in Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York and Near Washington, D.C. Opens Door for Low Cost Carriers to Compete Resulting in More Choices and More Competitive Airfares for Consumers

WASHINGTON — The  Department of Justice today announced that it is requiring US Airways Group Inc. and American  Airlines’ parent corporation, AMR Corp. to divest slots and gates at key  constrained airports across the country to low cost carrier airlines (LCCs) in  order to enhance system-wide competition in the airline industry resulting in  more choices and more competitive airfares for consumers.

The  department said the proposed settlement will increase the presence of the LCCs  at Boston Logan International, Chicago O’Hare International, Dallas Love Field,  Los Angeles International, Miami International, New York LaGuardia  International and Ronald Reagan Washington National.  Providing the LCCs with the incentive and  ability to invest in new capacity and permitting them to compete more  extensively nationwide will enhance meaningful competition in the industry and  benefit airline travelers.

“This  agreement has the potential to shift the landscape of the airline industry. By  guaranteeing a bigger foothold for low-cost carriers at key U.S. airports, this  settlement ensures airline passengers will see more competition on nonstop and  connecting routes throughout the country,” said Attorney General Eric Holder.  “The department’s ultimate goal has remained steadfast throughout this process  – to ensure vigorous competition in airline travel. This is vital to millions  of consumers who will benefit from both more competitive prices and enhanced  travel options.”

Six  state attorneys general–Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Tennessee and  Virginia–and the District of Columbia joined in the department’s proposed  settlement, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of  Columbia.  If approved by the court, the  settlement will resolve the department’s competitive concerns and the  lawsuit.

“The  extensive slot and gate divestitures at these key airports are groundbreaking  and they will dramatically enhance the ability of LCCs to compete system-wide,”  said Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer of the Department of Justice’s  Antitrust Division.  “This settlement  will disrupt the cozy relationships among the incumbent legacy carriers,  increase access to key congested airports and provide consumers with more  choices and more competitive airfares on flights all across the country.”

On  Aug. 13, 2013, the department, six state attorneys general and the District of  Columbia filed an antitrust lawsuit against US Airways and American alleging  that US Airway’s $11 billion acquisition of American would have substantially  lessened competition for commercial air travel in local markets throughout the  United States.  The department alleged  that the transaction would result in passengers paying higher airfares and  receiving less service.  In addition, the  department alleged that the transaction would entrench the merged airline as  the dominant carrier at Reagan National, where it would control 69 percent of  take-off and landing slots, thus effectively foreclosing entry or expansion by  competing airlines.

The  settlement requires US Airways and American to divest slots, gates and ground  facilities at key airports around the country.   Specifically, the settlement requires the companies to divest or  transfer to low cost carrier purchasers approved by the department:

All  104 air carrier slots (i.e. slots not reserved for use only by smaller,  commuter planes) at Reagan National and rights and interest in other facilities  at the airport necessary to support the use of the slots;

Thirty-four  slots at LaGuardia and rights and interest in other facilities at the airport  necessary to support the use of the slots; and

Rights  and interests to two airport gates and associated ground facilities at each  of  Boston Logan, Chicago O’Hare, Dallas  Love Field, Los Angeles International and Miami International.

The  Reagan National and LaGuardia slots will be sold under procedures approved by  the department.  Under the terms of the  settlement, JetBlue at Reagan National and Southwest at LaGuardia will be given  the opportunity to acquire the slots they currently lease from American.  The remaining 88 slots at Reagan National and  24 slots at LaGuardia plus any JetBlue or Southwest decline to acquire will be  grouped into bundles, taking into account specific slot times to ensure  commercially viable and competitive patterns of service for the recipients of  the divested slots.  The parties will  divest these slot bundles and all rights and interests in any gates and other  ground facilities (e.g., ticket counters, baggage handling facilities, office  space and loading bridges) as necessary to support the use of the purchased  slots.

The  gates at the five airports will be transferred on commercially reasonable terms  to the new acquirers.  The acquirers of  the slot and gate divestitures also require approval of the department.  Preference will be given to airlines at each  airport that do not currently operate a large share of slots or gates.

The  proposed settlement allows the department to appoint a monitoring trustee to  oversee the divestitures or transfers of the slots and gates. The settlement  also prohibits the merged company from reacquiring an ownership interest in the  divested slots or gates during the term of the settlement.  The companies must also provide advance  notice of any future slot acquisition at Reagan National regardless of whether  or not it is a reportable transaction under the premerger notification law and  further provides for waiting periods and opportunities for the department to  obtain additional information in order to review the transaction.

AMR  is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Fort Worth,  Texas.  AMR is the parent company of  American Airlines.  Last year American  flew more than 80 million passengers to more than 250 destinations worldwide  and took in more than $24 billion in revenue.   In November 2011, American filed for bankruptcy reorganization.

US Airways is a Delaware  corporation with its principal place of business in Tempe, Ariz.  Last year US Airways flew more than 50  million passengers to more than 200 destinations worldwide and took in more  than $13 billion in revenue.

Northern California Real Estate Investor Agrees to Plead Guilty to Bid Rigging at Public Foreclosure Auctions; Investigations Have Yielded 38 Plea Agreements to Date

Posted on by
A Northern California real estate investor has agreed to plead guilty for his role in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California, the Department of Justice announced.

Felony charges were filed today in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in Oakland against Chuokee “Joseph” Bo of Pleasanton, Calif.

Bo is the 38th individual to plead guilty or agree to plead guilty as a  result of the department’s ongoing antitrust investigations into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California.

According to court documents, Bo conspired with others not to bid against one another, but instead designated a winning bidder to obtain selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Alameda County, Calif.    Bo was also charged with conspiring to use the mail to carry out a scheme to fraudulently acquire title to selected Alameda County properties sold at public auctions, to make and receive payoffs, and to divert money to co-conspirators that would have otherwise gone to mortgage holders and others by holding second, private auctions open only to members of the conspiracy.  The department said that the selected properties were then awarded to the conspirators who submitted the highest bids in the second, private auctions.  The private auctions often took place at or near the courthouse steps where the public auctions were held.  Bo is charged with participating in the conspiracies beginning as early as August 2009 and continuing until about October 2010.

“Today’s plea agreement is the latest step in the Antitrust Division’s efforts to preserve open competition in local markets,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division.  “The division remains committed to prosecuting individuals who subvert the competitive process for their own profit.”

The department said that the primary purpose of the conspiracies was to suppress and restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in order to obtain selected real estate offered at Alameda County public foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices.  When real estate properties are sold at these auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the mortgage and other debt attached to the property, with remaining proceeds, if any, paid to the homeowner.  According to court documents, these conspirators paid and received money that otherwise would have gone to pay off the mortgage and other holders of debt secured by the properties, and, in some cases, the defaulting homeowner.

“This is another example of justice being served in preserving the fairness of public real estate foreclosure auctions as well as the FBI’s commitment in investigating those who take advantage of a competitive marketplace,” said David J. Johnson, FBI Special Agent in Charge of the San Francisco Field Office. “Criminal activity like this takes place in our communities and we continue to rely on the public’s help in seeking those who cheat the system.”

A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals.  The maximum fine for the Sherman Act charges may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims if either amount is greater than $1 million.  A count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.  The government can also seek to forfeit the proceeds earned from participating in the conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

Today’s charges are the latest filed by the department in its ongoing investigation into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa, and Alameda counties, Calif.  These investigations are being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San Francisco Office.  Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to public real estate foreclosure auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office at 415-436-6660, visit  www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.html or call the FBI tip line at 415-553-7400.

Today’s charges were brought in connection with the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.  The task force was established to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.  With more than 20 federal agencies, 94 U.S. Attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it is the broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory agencies ever assembled to combat fraud.  Since its formation, the task force has made great strides in facilitating increased investigation and prosecution of financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among federal, state and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending and financial markets and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial institutions and other organizations. Over the past three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed nearly 10,000 financial fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants, including more than 2,900 mortgage fraud defendants. For more information on the task force, please visit  www.StopFraud.gov.

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTOR PLEADS GUILTY TO BID RIGGING AT PUBLIC FORECLOSURE AUCTIONS

Posted on by

WASHINGTON — A Northern California real estate investor pleaded guilty today for his  role in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate  foreclosure auctions in Northern California, the Department of Justice  announced.

Kuo Hsuan “Chuck” Chang, of San Francisco, entered his guilty plea in  U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San  Francisco.  Felony charges were filed  against Chang on Oct. 9, 2013.

Chang is the 37th individual to plead guilty or agree to plead guilty  as a result of the department’s ongoing antitrust investigations  into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in  Northern California.

According to court documents, Chang conspired with others  not to bid against one another, but instead to designate a winning bidder to  obtain selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San  Francisco County, Calif.  Chang was also  charged with conspiring to use the mail to carry out schemes to fraudulently  acquire title to selected properties sold at public auctions, to make and  receive payoffs, and to divert co-conspirators’ money that would have otherwise  gone to mortgage holders and others.  Chang is charged with participating in these conspiracies beginning  as early as October 2009 and continuing until about November 2010.

“The Antitrust Division will continue to vigorously prosecute  anticompetitive schemes that compromise local markets and cause financial harm  to consumers,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the  Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division.   “Collusion at foreclosure auctions harmed both lenders and distressed  homeowners in an already struggling real estate market, and the conspirators  must be held accountable.”

As described in the charging document, the primary purpose of the conspiracies was to suppress and  restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in order to obtain selected real  estate offered at San Francisco County public foreclosure auctions at  non-competitive prices.  When real estate  properties are sold at these auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the  mortgage and other debt attached to the property, with remaining proceeds, if  any, paid to the homeowner.  According  to court documents, these conspirators paid and received money that otherwise  would have gone to pay off the mortgage and other holders of debt secured by  the properties, and, in some cases, the defaulting homeowner.

“We urge anyone with information regarding fraudulent anticompetitive  practices at foreclosure auctions to contact the FBI or our partners at the  Antitrust Division,” said FBI San Francisco Special Agent in Charge David J.  Johnson.  “The FBI will continue to work with our law enforcement partners  and the community to root out and bring to justice those individuals who  undermine the real estate market and victimize legitimate consumers.”

A violation of the  Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million  fine for individuals. The maximum fine for the Sherman Act charges may be increased  to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the  victims if either amount is greater than $1 million. A count of conspiracy to  commit mail fraud carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1  million fine.

The charges against  Chang are the latest filed by the department in its ongoing investigation into  bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San  Francisco, San Mateo, Alameda and Contra Costa counties, Calif.  These investigations are being conducted by  the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San Francisco  Office.  Anyone with information  concerning bid rigging or fraud related to public real estate foreclosure  auctions should  contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco office at 415-436-6660, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.html or call the FBI tip  line at 415-553-7400.

This case was brought  in connection with the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.  The task force was established to wage an  aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute  financial crimes.  With more than 20 federal  agencies, 94 U.S. Attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it is the  broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory agencies  ever assembled to combat fraud.  Since  its formation, the task force has made great strides in facilitating increased  investigation and prosecution of financial crimes; enhancing coordination and  cooperation among federal, state and local authorities; addressing  discrimination in the lending and financial markets and conducting outreach to  the public, victims, financial institutions and other organizations.  Over the past three fiscal years, the Justice  Department has filed nearly 10,000 financial fraud cases against nearly 15,000  defendants, including more than 2,900 mortgage fraud defendants.  For more information on the task force, please  visit  www.StopFraud.gov

RABOBANK ADMITS WRONGDOING IN LIBOR INVESTIGATION, AGREES TO PAY $325 MILLION CRIMINAL PENALTY

Posted on by

WASHINGTON — Coöperatieve Centrale  Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank) has entered into an  agreement with the Department of Justice to pay a $325 million penalty to  resolve violations arising from Rabobank’s submissions for the London InterBank  Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor), which are  leading benchmark interest rates around the world, the Justice Department  announced today.

A criminal information will be filed  today in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut that charges  Rabobank as part of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA). The  information charges Rabobank with wire fraud for its role in manipulating the  benchmark interest rates LIBOR and Euribor. In addition to the $325  million penalty, the DPA requires the  bank to admit and accept responsibility for its misconduct as described in an  extensive statement of facts. Rabobank has agreed to continue cooperating  with the Justice Department in its ongoing investigation of the manipulation of  benchmark interest rates by other financial institutions and  individuals.

“For years, employees at Rabobank, often working with traders at other  banks around the globe, illegally manipulated four different interest rates –  Euribor and LIBOR for the U.S. dollar, the yen, and the pound sterling – in the  hopes of fraudulently moving the market to generate profits for their traders  at the expense of the bank’s counterparties,” said Acting Assistant Attorney  General Mythili Raman of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.  “Today’s criminal resolution – which represents the second-largest penalty in  the Criminal Division’s active, ongoing investigation of the manipulation of  global benchmark interest rates by some of the largest banks in the world –  comes fast on the heels of charges brought against three former ICAP brokers  just last month. Rabobank is the fourth major financial institution that  has admitted its misconduct in this wide-ranging criminal investigation, and  other banks should pay attention: our investigation is far from over.”

“Rabobank rigged multiple benchmark rates, allowing its traders to reap  higher profits at the expense of their unsuspecting counterparties,” said  Deputy Assistant Attorney General Leslie C. Overton of the Justice  Department’s Antitrust Division. “Not only was this conduct fraudulent,  it compromised the integrity of globally-used interest rate benchmarks –  undermining financial markets worldwide.”

“Rabobank admitted to manipulating LIBOR and Euribor submissions which  directly affected the rates referenced by financial products held by and on  behalf of companies and investors around the world,” said Assistant Director in  Charge Valerie Parlave of the FBI’s Washington Field Office. “Rabobank’s  actions resulted in the deliberate harm to counterparties holding products  referencing the manipulated rates. Today’s announcement is yet another  example of the tireless efforts of the FBI special agents and forensic  accountants who are dedicated to investigating complex fraud schemes and,  together with prosecutors, bringing to justice those who participate in such  schemes.”

Together with approximately $740 million in criminal and regulatory  penalties imposed by other agencies in actions arising out of the same conduct  – $475 million by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) action, $170  million by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) action and approximately  $96 million by the Openbaar Ministerie (the Dutch Public Prosecution Service) –  the Justice Department’s $325 million criminal penalty brings the total amount  to be paid by Rabobank to more than $1 billion.

According to signed documents, LIBOR is an average interest rate,  calculated based upon submissions from leading banks around the world and  reflecting the rates those banks believe they would be charged if borrowing  from other banks. LIBOR serves as the primary benchmark for short-term  interest rates globally and is used as a reference rate for many interest rate  contracts, mortgages, credit cards, student loans and other consumer lending  products. The Bank of International Settlements estimated that as of the  second half of 2009, outstanding interest rate contracts were valued at  approximately $450 trillion.

LIBOR is published by the British Bankers’ Association (BBA), a trade  association based in London. At the time relevant to the conduct in the  criminal information, LIBOR was calculated for 10 currencies at 15 borrowing  periods, known as maturities, ranging from overnight to one year. The  LIBOR for a given currency at a specific maturity is the result of a  calculation based upon submissions from a panel of banks for that currency (the  Contributor Panel) selected by the BBA. From at least 2005 through 2011,  Rabobank was a member of the Contributor Panel for a number of currencies,  including United States dollar (dollar) LIBOR, pound sterling LIBOR, and yen  LIBOR.

The Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor) is published by the European  Banking Federation (EBF), which is based in Brussels, Belgium, and is  calculated at 15 maturities, ranging from overnight to one year. Euribor  is the rate at which Euro interbank term deposits within the Euro zone are  expected to be offered by one prime bank to another at 11:00 a.m. Brussels  time. The Euribor at a given maturity is the result of a calculation based  upon submissions from Euribor Contributor Panel banks. From at least 2005  through 2011, Rabobank was also a member of the Contributor Panel for  Euribor.

According to the statement of facts accompanying the agreement, from as  early as 2005 through at least November 2010, certain Rabobank derivatives  traders requested that certain Rabobank dollar LIBOR, yen LIBOR, pound sterling  LIBOR, and Euribor submitters submit LIBOR and Euribor contributions that would  benefit the traders’ trading positions, rather than rates that complied with  the definitions of LIBOR and Euribor.

In addition, according to the statement of facts accompanying the  agreement, from as early as January 2006 through October 2008, a Rabobank yen  LIBOR submitter and a Rabobank Euribor submitter had two separate agreements  with traders at other banks to make yen LIBOR and Euribor submissions that  benefitted trading positions, rather than submissions that complied with the  definitions of LIBOR and Euribor.

The Rabobank LIBOR and Euribor submitters accommodated traders’  requests on numerous occasions, and on various occasions, Rabobank’s  submissions affected the fixed rates.

According to the statement of facts, Rabobank employees engaged in this  conduct through electronic communications, which included both emails and  electronic chats. For example, on Sept. 21, 2007, a Rabobank Yen  derivatives trader emailed the Rabobank Yen LIBOR submitter at the time with  the subject line “libors,” writing: “Wehre do you think today’s libors are?  If you can, I would like 1mth libors higher today.” The submitter  replied: “Bookies reckon 1m sets at .85.” The trader wrote back: “I have  some fixings in 1 mth so would appreciate if you can put it higher mate.”  The submitter replied: “No prob mate let me know your level.” The trader  responded: “Wud be nice if you could put 0.90% for 1mth cheers.” The  submitter wrote back: “Sure no prob. I’ll probably get a few phone calls but no  worries mate!” The trader replied: “If you may get a few phone calls then  put 0.88% then.” The submitter responded: “Don’t worry mate – there’s  bigger crooks in the market than us guys!” That day, as requested,  Rabobank’s 1-month Yen LIBOR submission was 0.90, an increase of seven basis  points from its previous submission, whereas the other panel banks’ submissions  decreased by approximately a half of a basis point on average. Rabobank’s  submission went from being tied as the tenth highest submission on the  Contributor Panel on the previous day to being the highest submission on the  Contributor Panel.

On Nov. 29, 2006, a Rabobank dollar derivatives trader wrote to  Rabobank’s Global Head of Liquidity and Finance and the head of Rabobank’s  money markets desk in London, who supervised rate submitters: “Hi mate, low 1s  high 3s LIBOR pls !!! Dont tell [another Rabobank U.S. Dollar derivatives  trader] haa haaaaaaa. Sold the market today doooooohhhh!” The money  markets desk head replied: “ok mate , will do my best …speak later.”  After the LIBOR submissions that day, Rabobank’s ranking compared to other  panel banks dropped as to 1-month dollar LIBOR and rose as to 3-month dollar  LIBOR. Two days later, on Dec. 1, 2006, the trader again wrote to the money  markets desk head: “Appreciate 3s go down, but a high 3s today would be nice…  cheers chief.” The money markets desk head wrote back: “I am fast turning  into your LIBOR bitch!!!!” The trader replied: “Just friendly  encouragement that’s all , appreciate the help.” The money markets desk  head wrote back: “No worries mate , glad to help ….We just stuffed ourselves  with good ol pie , mash n licker !!”

In an example of an agreement with traders at other banks, on July 28,  2006, a Rabobank rate submitter and Rabobank trader discussed their mutual  desires for a high fixing. The submitter stated to the trader: “setting a  high 1m again today – I need it!” to which the trader responded: “yes pls  mate…I need a higher 1m libor too.” Within approximately 20 minutes, the  submitter contacted a trader at another Contributor Panel bank and wrote: “morning  skipper…..will be setting an obscenely high 1m again today…poss 38 just  fyi.” The other bank’s trader responded, “(K)…oh dear..my poor  customers….hehehe!! manual input libors again today then!!!!” Both  banks’ submissions on July 28 moved up one basis point, from 0.37 to 0.38, a  move which placed their submissions as the second highest submissions on the  Contributor Panel that day.

As another example, on July 7, 2009, a Rabobank trader wrote to a  former Rabobank yen LIBOR submitter: “looks like some ppl are talking with each  other when they put libors down. . . quite surprised that 3m libors came down a  lot.” The former submitter replied: “yes deffinite manipulation – always  is tho to be honest mate. . . i always used to ask if anyone needed a favour  and vise versa. . . . a little unethical but always helps to have friends in  mrkt.”

By entering into a DPA with Rabobank, the Justice Department took  several factors into consideration, including that Rabobank has no history of  similar misconduct and has not been the subject of any criminal enforcement  actions or any significant regulatory enforcement actions by any authority in  the United States, the Netherlands, or elsewhere. In addition, Rabobank  has significantly expanded and enhanced its legal and regulatory compliance  program and has taken extensive steps to remediate the misconduct.  Significant remedies and sanctions are also being imposed on Rabobank by  several regulators and an additional criminal law enforcement agency (the Dutch  Public Prosecution Service).

This ongoing investigation is being conducted by special agents, forensic  accountants, and intelligence analysts of the FBI’s Washington Field  Office. The prosecution of Rabobank is being handled by Assistant Chief  Glenn S. Leon and Trial Attorney Alexander H. Berlin of the Criminal Division’s  Fraud Section and Trial Attorneys Ludovic C. Ghesquiere, Michael T. Koenig and  Eric L. Schleef of the Antitrust Division. Deputy Chiefs Daniel Braun and  William Stellmach of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, Criminal Division  Senior Counsel Rebecca Rohr, Assistant Chief Elizabeth B. Prewitt and Trial  Attorney Richard A. Powers of the Antitrust Division’s New York Office, and  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Eric Glover and Liam Brennan of the U.S. Attorney’s  Office for the District of Connecticut, along with Criminal Division’s Office  of International Affairs, have provided valuable assistance in this  matter.

The investigation leading to these cases has  required, and has greatly benefited from, a diligent and wide-ranging  cooperative effort among various enforcement agencies both in the United States  and abroad. The Justice Department acknowledges and expresses its deep  appreciation for this assistance. In particular, the CFTC’s Division of  Enforcement referred this matter to the department and, along with the FCA, has  played a major role in the investigation. The department has also worked  closely with the Dutch Public Prosecution Service and De Nederlandsche Bank  (the Dutch Central Bank) in the investigation of Rabobank. Various  agencies and enforcement authorities from other nations are also participating  in different aspects of the broader investigation relating to LIBOR and other  benchmark rates, and the department is grateful for their cooperation and  assistance. In particular, the Securities and Exchange Commission has  played a significant role in the LIBOR investigation, and the department  expresses its appreciation to the United Kingdom’s Serious Fraud Office for its  assistance and ongoing cooperation.

This  prosecution is part of efforts underway by President Barack Obama’s Financial  Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency  Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated and  proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task  force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies,  regulatory authorities, inspectors general and state and local law enforcement  who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil  enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts  across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to  investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and  effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat  discrimination in the lending and financial markets and recover proceeds for  victims of financial crimes. For more information about the task force  visit: www.stopfraud.gov.

 

GEORGIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT COMPANY AND OWNER PLEAD GUILTY TO CONSPIRACIES TO RIG BIDS AND COMMIT MAIL FRAUD FOR THE PURCHASE OF REAL ESTATE AT PUBLIC FORECLOSURE AUCTIONS

Posted on by

WASHINGTON — A Georgia real estate investor and his company pleaded guilty today for  their role in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate  foreclosure auctions in Georgia, the Department of Justice announced.

Separate felony charges were filed on  Sept. 25, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia  in Atlanta, against Penguin Properties LLC and its owner, Seth D. Lynn.

According to court documents, from  at least as early as Feb. 6, 2007 until at least Jan. 3, 2012, Penguin  Properties and Lynn conspired  with others not to bid against one another, but instead to designate a winning bidder to obtain selected properties at public  real estate foreclosure auctions in Fulton County, Ga.  Penguin Properties and Lynn were also charged with a  conspiracy to use the mail to carry out a scheme to fraudulently acquire title  to selected Fulton County properties sold at public auctions, to make and  receive payoffs and to divert money to co-conspirators that would have gone to  mortgage holders and others by holding second, private auctions open only to  members of the conspiracy.  The  department said that the selected properties were then awarded to the  conspirators who submitted the highest bids in the second, private auctions.

Charges  were also brought against Penguin Properties and Lynn for their involvement in  similar conspiracies in DeKalb County, Ga., from at least as early as July 6,  2004 until at least Jan. 3, 2012.

“Today’s charges are the first to be filed in the state of  Georgia in the Antitrust Division’s ongoing investigation into anticompetitive conduct  in real estate foreclosure auctions,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney  General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division.  “The division’s investigation has already  resulted in dozens of guilty pleas in other states, and the division remains  committed to eliminating anticompetitive practices at foreclosure auctions.”

The  department said that the primary purpose of the conspiracies was to suppress  and restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in order to obtain selected  real estate offered at Fulton and DeKalb County public foreclosure auctions at  non-competitive prices.  When real estate  properties are sold at these auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the  mortgage and other debt attached to the property, with remaining proceeds, if  any, paid to the homeowner.  According to  court documents, these conspirators paid and received money that otherwise  would have gone to pay off the mortgage and other holders of debt secured by  the properties, and, in some cases, the defaulting homeowner.

“The core of this case was about an unlevel field  and one of unfairness with regard to the auction/bidding process of foreclosed  properties,” said Mark F. Giuliano, Special  Agent in Charge of the FBI Atlanta Field Office.  “The FBI remains committed in  providing investigative resources to the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust  effort to address such matters.”

A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10  years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals and a $100 million fine  for corporations.  The maximum fine for a  Sherman Act charge may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or  twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime if either amount is greater  than the statutory maximum fine.  A count  of conspiracy to commit mail fraud carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in  prison and a fine of $250,000 for an individual, and a fine of $500,000 for a  corporation.  The respective maximum  fines for the conspiracy to commit mail fraud charge may be increased to twice  the gross gain the conspirators derived from the crime or twice the gross loss  caused to the victims of the crime by the conspirators.

The investigation is being conducted  by Antitrust Division attorneys in Atlanta and the FBI’s Atlanta Division, with  the assistance of the Atlanta Field Office of the Housing and Urban Development  Office of Inspector General and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern  District of Georgia.  Anyone with  information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to public real estate  foreclosure auctions should call 404-331-7113 or visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm.

Today’s  charges were brought in connection with the President’s Financial Fraud  Enforcement Task Force.  The task force  was established to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to  investigate and prosecute financial crimes.  With more than 20 federal agencies, 94 U.S.  attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it’s the broadest coalition of  law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory agencies ever assembled to combat  fraud.  Since its formation, the task  force has made great strides in facilitating increased investigation and  prosecution of financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among  federal, state and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending  and financial markets and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial  institutions and other organizations.  Over  the past three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed nearly 10,000  financial fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants including more than  2,900 mortgage fraud defendants.  For  more information on the task force, please visit www.StopFraud.gov.

LIBOR update: Wall Street Journal Ordered Not to Divulge Libor Names

Posted on by

Journal Ordered Not to Divulge Libor Names

U.K. Prosecutors Win Injunction Amid Investigation

“A British judge ordered the Journal and David Enrich, the newspaper’s European banking editor, to comply with a request by the U.K.’s Serious Fraud Office prohibiting the newspaper from publishing names of individuals not yet made public in the government’s ongoing investigation into alleged manipulation of the London interbank offered rate, or Libor.”