Tag Archives: Sherman Act

FIRST EVER EXTRADITION ON ANTITRUST CHARGE

Posted on by

 

WASHINGTON — Romano Pisciotti, an Italian national, was extradited from Germany on a charge of participating in a conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by rigging bids, fixing prices and allocating market shares for sales of marine hose sold in the United States and elsewhere, the Department of Justice announced today.  This marks the first successfully litigated extradition on an antitrust charge.

Pisciotti, a former executive with Parker ITR Srl, a marine hose manufacturer headquartered in Veniano, Italy, was arrested in Germany on June 17, 2013.  He arrived in the Southern District of Florida, in Miami, yesterday and is scheduled to make his initial appearance today in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Ft. Lauderdale, at 11:00 a.m. EDT.

“This first of its kind extradition on an antitrust charge allows the department to bring an alleged price fixer to the United States to face charges of participating in a worldwide conspiracy,” said Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division.  “This marks a significant step forward in our ongoing efforts to work with our international antitrust colleagues to ensure that those who seek to subvert U.S. law are brought to justice.”

Marine hose is a flexible rubber hose used to transfer oil between tankers and storage facilities.  During the conspiracy, the cartel affected prices for hundreds of millions of dollars in sales of marine hose and related products sold worldwide.

According to a one-count felony indictment filed under seal on Aug. 26, 2010, and ordered unsealed on Aug. 5, 2013, in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Florida,  Pisciotti carried out the conspiracy by agreeing during meetings, conversations and communications to allocate shares of the marine hose market among the conspirators; use a price list for marine hose in order to implement the conspiracy; and not compete for customers with other marine hose sellers either by not submitting prices or bids or by submitting intentionally high prices or bids, all in accordance with the agreements reached among the conspiring companies.  As part of the conspiracy, Pisciotti and his conspirators provided information received from customers in the United States and elsewhere about upcoming marine hose jobs to a co-conspirator who served as the coordinator of the conspiracy.  That coordinator acted as a clearinghouse for bidding information that was shared among the conspirators, and was paid by the manufacturers for coordinating the conspiracy. The department said the conspiracy began at least as early as 1999 and continued until at least May 2007.  Pisciotti was charged with joining and participating in the conspiracy from at least as early as 1999 until at least November 2006.

Pisciotti is charged with violating the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million criminal fine for individuals.  The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

As a result of the department’s ongoing marine hose investigation, five companies, including Parker ITR; Bridgestone Corp. of Japan; Manuli SPa of Italy’s Florida subsidiary; Trelleborg of France; and Dunlop Marine and Oil Ltd, of the United Kingdom, and nine individuals have pleaded guilty.

The investigation is being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s Washington Criminal I Section, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) of the Department of Defense’s Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Navy Criminal Investigative Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  The U.S. Marshals Service and other law enforcement agencies from multiple foreign jurisdictions are also investigating or assisting in the ongoing matter.  The Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs provided assistance.

Two Ocean Shipping Companies to Pay $3.4 Million to Settle Claims of Price Fixing Government Cargo Transportation Contracts

Posted on by
Sea Star Line LLC and Horizon Lines LLC have agreed to resolve allegations that they violated the False Claims Act by fixing the price of government cargo transportation contracts between the continental United States and Puerto Rico, the Department of Justice announced today.   Under the settlement agreements, Sea Star Line has agreed to pay $1.9 million, and Horizon Lines has agreed to pay $1.5 million.

“Today’s civil settlements demonstrate our continuing vigilance to ensure that those doing business with the government do not engage in anticompetitive conduct,” said Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Division Stuart F. Delery.   “Government contractors who seek to profit at the expense of taxpayers will face serious consequences.”

The government alleged that former executives of the defendant ocean shippers used personal email accounts to communicate confidential bidding information, thereby enabling each of the shippers to know the transportation rates that its competitor intended to submit to federal agencies for specific routes.   This information allowed the shippers to allocate specific routes between themselves at predetermined rates.   Among the contracts affected were U.S. Postal Service contracts to transport mail and Department of Agriculture contracts to ship food.   Both Sea Star Line and Horizon Lines previously pleaded guilty, in related criminal proceedings, to anticompetitive conduct in violation of the Sherman Act.

“Postal Service contractors must understand and know that actions that undermine the contracting process, such as conspiring to suppress and eliminate competition, will not be tolerated and will be aggressively investigated,” said Tom Frost, Special Agent in Charge of the Major Fraud Investigations Division (MFID) with the Postal Service Office of Inspector General.   “MFID will continue to work with DOJ, both criminally and civilly, to bring those individuals and companies to justice.”

The civil settlements resolve allegations in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Jacksonville, Fla., by former Sea Star Line executive William B. Stallings.   The lawsuit was filed under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private individuals to sue on behalf of the government for false claims and to share in any recovery.   The Act also allows the government to intervene and take over the action, as it did in this case.   Stallings will receive $512,719 of the recovered funds.

The settlements were the result of a coordinated effort by the Civil Division of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General.

The case is captioned United States ex rel. Stallings v. Sea Star Line LLC, et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-152-J-12JBT (M.D. Fla.).   The claims resolved by the settlements are allegations only, except to the extent the conduct was admitted as part of the defendants’ prior guilty pleas, and there has been no determination of liability.

SOUTH AMERICAN COMPANY AGREES TO PLEAD GUILTY TO PRICE FIXING ON OCEAN SHIPPING SERVICES FOR CARS AND TRUCKS

Posted on by

WASHINGTON — Compañía Sud Americana de Vapores S.A.  (CSAV), a Chilean corporation,  has agreed to plead guilty and to pay an $8.9 million criminal fine for its  involvement in a conspiracy to fix prices, allocate customers and rig bids of  international ocean shipping services for roll-on, roll-off cargo, such as cars  and trucks, to and from the United States and elsewhere, the Department of  Justice announced today.

According to a one-count felony charge filed today in U.S. District Court  for the District of Maryland in Baltimore, CSAV engaged in a conspiracy to  suppress and eliminate competition by allocating customers and routes, rigging  bids and fixing prices for the sale of international ocean shipping services of  roll-on, roll-off cargo to and from the United States and elsewhere, including  the Port of Baltimore.  CSAV participated  in the conspiracy from at least January 2000 to September 2012.  CSAV has also agreed to cooperate with the department’s  ongoing antitrust investigation.  The  plea agreement is subject to court approval.

Roll-on, roll-off cargo is non-containerized cargo that can be both  rolled onto and rolled off of an ocean-going vessel.  Examples of this cargo include new and used cars  and trucks, as well as construction, mining and agricultural equipment.

“Today’s charges  are the first to be filed in the Antitrust Division’s investigation into bid  rigging and price fixing of ocean shipping services,” said Bill Baer, Assistant  Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division.  “Because of the growth in the automobile ocean  shipping industry over the past 40 years, the conspiracy substantially affected  interstate and foreign commerce.  Prosecuting international price-fixing  conspiracies remains a top priority for the division.”

According to the  charge, CSAV and its co-conspirators carried out the conspiracy by, among other  things, agreeing – during meetings and communications – on prices, allocating  customers, agreeing to refrain from bidding against one another and exchanging  customer pricing information.  The  department said the companies then charged fees in accordance with those  agreements for international ocean shipping services for certain roll-on,  roll-off cargo to and from the United States and elsewhere at collusive and  non-competitive prices.

CSAV is charged with price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act,  which carries a maximum penalty of a $100 million criminal fine for  corporations.  The maximum fine may be  increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered  by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the  statutory maximum fine.

Today’s charge is the result of an ongoing federal antitrust  investigation into price fixing, bid rigging, and other anticompetitive conduct  in the international ocean shipping industry, which is being conducted by the  Antitrust Division’s National Criminal Enforcement Section and the FBI’s  Baltimore Field Office, along with assistance from the U.S. Customs and Border  Protection, Office of Internal Affairs, Washington Field Office/Special  Investigations Unit.   Anyone with information in connection with  this investigation is urged to call the Antitrust Division’s National Criminal  Enforcement Section at 202-307-6694, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.html,  or call the FBI’s Baltimore Field Office at 410-265-8080.

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTOR AGREES TO PLEAD GUILTY TO BID RIGGING AND FRAUD AT PUBLIC FORECLOSURE AUCTIONS

Posted on by

WASHINGTON — A Northern California real estate investor has agreed to plead guilty  for his role in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real  estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California, the Department of Justice  announced.

Felony charges were filed today in the U.S. District Court for the  Northern District of California in Oakland against Charles Gonzales, of Alamo, Calif.   Including  Gonzales, a total of 44 individuals have pleaded guilty or agreed to plead  guilty as a result of the department’s ongoing antitrust investigations into  bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern  California.

According to court documents, beginning as early as April  2009 until about October 2010, Gonzales conspired with others not to bid  against one another, and instead to designate a winning bidder to obtain  selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Alameda  County, Calif.  Gonzales was also charged  with conspiring to commit mail fraud by fraudulently acquiring title to  selected Alameda County properties sold at public auctions and making and  receiving payoffs and diverting money to co-conspirators that would have gone  to mortgage holders and others by holding second, private auctions open only to  members of the conspiracy.  The department  said that the selected properties were then awarded to the conspirators who  submitted the highest bids in the second, private auctions.  The private auctions often took place at or  near the courthouse steps where the public auctions were held.

“The Antitrust Division’s ongoing investigation has resulted in charges  against 44 individuals for their roles in schemes that defraud distressed  homeowners and lenders,” said, Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge  of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division.  “The division will continue to work with its  law enforcement partners to vigorously protect competition at the local level.”

The department said that the primary purpose of the  conspiracies was to suppress and restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in  order to obtain selected real estate offered at Alameda County public  foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices.  When real estate properties are sold at the  auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the mortgage and other debt attached  to the property, with remaining proceeds, if any, paid to the homeowner.  According to court documents, the conspirators  paid and received money that otherwise would have gone to pay off the mortgage  and other holders of debt secured by the properties, and, in some cases, the  defaulting homeowner.

“The symbolism of holding illegitimate and fraudulent  private auctions near a courthouse is deplorable,” said David J. Johnson, FBI Special Agent in Charge of the San Francisco Field Office.  “The justice system will continue to prevail  in this ongoing investigation pursuing bid rigging and fraud at public  foreclosure auctions.”

A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of  10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals.  The maximum fine for the Sherman Act charges  may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss  suffered by the victim if either amount is greater than $1 million.  A count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud  carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.  The government can also seek to forfeit the  proceeds earned from participating in the conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

Today’s charges are the latest filed by the department in  its ongoing investigation into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate  foreclosure auctions in San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa and Alameda counties,  Calif.  These investigations are being  conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San  Francisco Office.  Anyone with  information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to public real estate  foreclosure auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco  Office at 415-934-5300, or call the FBI tip line at 415-553-7400.

Today’s charges were brought in  connection with the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.  The task force was established to wage an  aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute  financial crimes.  With more than 20  federal agencies, 94 U.S. Attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it  is the broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory  agencies ever assembled to combat fraud.  Since its formation, the task force has made  great strides in facilitating increased investigation and prosecution of  financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among federal, state  and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending and financial  markets and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial institutions  and other organizations.  Over the past  three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed nearly 10,000 financial  fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants, including more than 2,900  mortgage fraud defendants.  For more  information on the task force, please visit www.StopFraud.gov.

Georgia Real Estate Investor Pleads Guilty to Bid Rigging and Fraud at Public Real Estate Foreclosure Auctions

Posted on by
A Georgia real estate investor pleaded guilty today for her role in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Georgia, the Department of Justice announced.

Felony charges were filed on Dec. 19, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta, against Amy James. According to court documents, from as early as Dec. 6, 2005, until at least Jan. 23, 2009, James conspired with others not to bid against one another, but instead to designate a winning bidder to obtain selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in DeKalb County, Ga.  James was also charged with a conspiracy to commit mail fraud by fraudulently acquiring title to selected DeKalb County properties sold at public auctions and making and receiving payoffs and diverting money to co-conspirators that would have gone to mortgage holders and others by holding second, private auctions open only to members of the conspiracy.  The department said that the selected properties were then awarded to the conspirators who submitted the highest bids in the second, private auctions.

“Today’s guilty plea is the third in the Antitrust Division’s ongoing investigation into anticompetitive behavior at real estate foreclosure auctions in the state of Georgia,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division.  “The Antitrust Division remains committed to holding accountable individuals who conspire to defraud distressed homeowners and lenders in Georgia and elsewhere.”

The department said that the primary purpose of the conspiracies was to suppress and restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in order to obtain real estate offered at DeKalb County public foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices.  When real estate properties are sold at these auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the mortgage and other debt attached to the property, with remaining proceeds, if any, paid to the homeowner.  According to court documents, the conspirators paid and received money that otherwise would have gone to pay off the mortgage and other holders of debt secured by the properties, and, in some cases, the defaulting homeowner.

“Today’s guilty plea reflects the FBI’s commitment toward enforcement of federal antitrust laws that are designed to provide a level playing field among businesses and individuals as they engage in competition for commerce,” said Ricky Maxwell, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Atlanta Field Office.  “The FBI will continue to work with its various law enforcement partners regarding these enforcement matters and asks that the public contact their nearest FBI field office regarding such unfair and illegal business practices.”

A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals. The maximum fine for a Sherman Act charge may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime if either amount is greater than the statutory maximum fine.  A count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000 for individuals.  The fine may be increased to twice the gross gain the conspirators derived from the crime or twice the gross loss caused to the victims of the crime.

The investigation is being conducted by Antitrust Division attorneys in Atlanta and the FBI’s Atlanta Division, with the assistance of the Atlanta Field Office of the Housing and Urban Development Office of Inspector General and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia.  Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to public real estate foreclosure auctions in Georgia should contact Antitrust Division prosecutors in Atlanta at 404-331-7113, call the Antitrust Division’s Citizen Complaint Center at 1-888-647-3258  or visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm.

Today’s charges were brought in connection with the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. The task force was established to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.  With more than 20 federal agencies, 94 U.S. attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it is the broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory agencies ever assembled to combat fraud.  Since its formation, the task force has made great strides in facilitating increased investigation and prosecution of financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among federal, state and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending and financial markets and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial institutions and other organizations.  Over the past three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed nearly 10,000 financial fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants including more than 2,900 mortgage fraud defendants.  For more information on the task force, please visit  www.StopFraud.gov.

Bridgestone Corp. Agrees to Plead Guilty to Price Fixing on Automobile Parts Installed in U.S. Cars

Posted on by

 

WASHINGTON — Bridgestone Corp., a Tokyo, Japan-based company, has agreed to plead guilty and to pay a $425  million criminal fine for its role in a conspiracy to fix prices of automotive  anti-vibration rubber parts installed in cars sold in the United States and  elsewhere, the Department of Justice announced today.

According to a  one-count felony charge filed today in U.S. District Court for the Northern  District of Ohio in Toledo, Bridgestone engaged in a conspiracy to allocate  sales of, to rig bids for and to fix, raise and maintain the prices of automotive  anti-vibration rubber parts it sold to Toyota Motor Corp., Nissan Motor Corp.,  Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd., Suzuki Motor Corp., Isuzu Motors Ltd. and certain  of their subsidiaries, affiliates and suppliers, in the United States and  elsewhere.  In addition to the criminal  fine, Bridgestone also has agreed to cooperate with the department’s ongoing  auto parts investigations.  The plea  agreement is subject to court approval.

In October 2011,  Bridgestone pleaded guilty and paid a $28 million fine for price-fixing and  Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations in the marine hose industry, but did  not disclose at the time of the plea that it had also participated in the  anti-vibration rubber parts conspiracy.  Bridgestone’s  failure to disclose this conspiracy was a factor in determining the $425  million fine.

“The Antitrust Division will take a hard line when repeat offenders  fail to disclose additional anticompetitive behavior,” said Brent Snyder, Deputy  Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division’s criminal enforcement  program.  “Today’s significant fine  reaffirms the division’s commitment to holding companies accountable for  conduct that harms U.S. consumers.”

According to the  charges, Bridgestone and its co-conspirators carried out the conspiracy through  meetings and conversations in which they discussed and agreed upon bids, prices  and allocating sales of certain automotive anti-vibration rubber products.  After exchanging this information with its  co-conspirators, Bridgestone submitted bids and prices in accordance with those  agreements and sold and accepted payments for automotive anti-vibration rubber  parts at collusive and noncompetitive prices.  Bridgestone’s involvement in the conspiracy to  fix prices of anti-vibration rubber parts lasted from at least January 2001  until at least December 2008.

“The Cleveland  Division of the FBI is committed to aggressively investigating price-fixing and  other antitrust violations,” said Special Agent in Charge Stephen D. Anthony.  “The illegal activity in this case threatened  the basic tenet of free competition.  We  are pleased with the acceptance of responsibility along with the significant  penalty which will be paid by Bridgestone for this conspiracy to fix prices.  Together with our partners in the Department  of Justice’s Antitrust Division, we will continue to combat illegal practices  which threaten consumers across the United States.”

Bridgestone manufactures and sells a variety of  automotive parts, including anti-vibration  rubber parts, which are comprised primarily of rubber and metal, and are  installed in suspension systems and engine mounts as well as other parts of an  automobile.  They are installed in  automobiles for the purpose of reducing road and engine vibration.

Including  Bridgestone, 26 companies have pleaded guilty or agreed to plead guilty in the department’s  ongoing investigation into price fixing and bid rigging in the automotive parts  industry.  The companies have agreed to  pay a total of more than $2 billion in criminal fines.  Additionally, 28 individuals have been  charged.

Bridgestone is  charged with price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, which carries  maximum penalties of a $100 million criminal fine for corporations.  The maximum fine may be increased to twice the  gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the  crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

Today’s  prosecution is the result of an ongoing federal antitrust investigation into  price fixing, bid rigging and other anticompetitive conduct in the automotive  parts industry, which is being conducted by each of the Antitrust Division’s  criminal enforcement sections and the FBI.  Today’s charge was brought by the Antitrust  Division’s Chicago Office and the FBI’s Cleveland Field Office, with the  assistance of the FBI headquarters’ International Corruption Unit and the U.S.  Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Ohio.  Anyone with information concerning this investigation  should contact the Antitrust Division’s Citizen Complaint Center at  1–888–647–3258, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.html or call the  FBI’s Cleveland Field Office at 216-522-1400.

AISAN INDUSTRY CO. LTD. AGREES TO PLEAD GUILTY TO PRICE FIXING ON AUTOMOBILE PARTS INSTALLED IN U.S. CARS

Posted on by

WASHINGTON — Aisan Industry Co. Ltd., an Obu, Japan-based company, has agreed to  plead guilty and to pay a criminal fine of $6.86 million for its role in a  price-fixing conspiracy involving electronic  throttle bodies sold in the United States and elsewhere, the Department of  Justice announced today.

According to a one-count felony charge filed  today in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in Detroit, Aisan engaged in a  conspiracy to rig bids for, and to fix, stabilize and maintain the prices of  electronic throttle bodies sold to Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. and certain of its  subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere.  In addition to the criminal fine, Aisan has also agreed to  cooperate with the department’s ongoing auto parts investigations. The plea agreement is  subject to court approval.
“The Antitrust Division will continue to hold companies accountable for  anticompetitive conduct that impacts the automobile industry in the United  States,” said Brent Snyder, Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the Antitrust  Division’s criminal enforcement program.  “To date, 25 companies have been charged as  part of the Antitrust Division’s ongoing auto parts investigation.”

According to the charges, Aisan and its co-conspirators carried out the price-fixing conspiracy  through meetings and conversations in which they discussed and agreed upon bids  and price quotations for electronic throttle bodies.  Aisan’s  involvement in the conspiracy to fix prices of electronic  throttle bodies lasted from at least as early as October 2003 until at  least February 2010.

Aisan manufactures and sells automotive electronic throttle bodies,  which are part of the air intake system in an engine that controls the amount  of air flowing into an engine’s combustion chamber.  By controlling air flow within an engine, the  electronic throttle body controls engine speed.

Including Aisan, 25 corporations have pleaded guilty or agreed to plead  guilty in the department’s investigation into price fixing and bid rigging in  the auto parts industry.  The companies  have agreed to pay a total of more than $1.8 billion in fines.  Additionally, 28 individuals have been charged.

Aisan is charged with price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act,  which carries a maximum penalty of a $100 million criminal fine for  corporations.  The maximum fine may be  increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered  by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the  statutory maximum fine.

Today’s prosecution arose from an ongoing federal antitrust  investigation into price fixing, bid rigging and other anticompetitive conduct  in the automotive parts industry, which is being conducted by each of the  Antitrust Division’s criminal enforcement sections and the FBI.  Today’s charges were brought by the San  Francisco Office of the Antitrust Division with assistance provided by the  National Criminal Enforcement Section of the Antitrust Division, the Detroit  Field Office of the FBI, and the FBI headquarters’ National Criminal Enforcement Section.  Anyone with information concerning  this investigation should contact the Antitrust Division’s Citizen Complaint  Center at 1-888-647-3258, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.html  or call the Detroit Field Office of the FBI at  313-965-2323.

FORMER PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF DIAMOND ELECTRIC AGREE TO PLEAD GUILTY TO PARTICIPATING IN AUTO PARTS PRICE-FIXING CONSPIRACY

Posted on by

WASHINGTON — The former president and vice president of Osaka,  Japan-based Diamond Electric Mfg. Co. Ltd. have agreed to plead guilty for  their participation in a global conspiracy to fix prices of ignition coils  installed in cars sold in the United States and elsewhere, the Department of Justice  announced today.  Ignition coils are part  of a car’s fuel ignition system and release electric energy suddenly to ignite  a fuel mixture.

Separate  felony charges were filed today in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District  of Michigan in Detroit against Shigehiko Ikenaga and Tatsuo Ikenaga.  According to court documents, from at least as  early as July 2003 until at least February 2010, the former executives participated  in a conspiracy to rig bids for, and to fix, stabilize and maintain the prices  of ignition coils sold to automotive manufacturers for installation in vehicles  manufactured in the United States and elsewhere.  The automotive manufacturers included Ford  Motor Co., Toyota Motor Corp. and Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. – more commonly  known by its brand name, Subaru – and certain of their subsidiaries.

Shigehiko  Ikenaga, president of Diamond Electric during the relevant period, agreed to  serve 16 months in a U.S. prison.  Tatsuo  Ikenaga, Diamond Electric’s managing director, and then vice president  beginning in 2008, agreed to serve 13 months in a U.S. prison.  Tatsuo Ikenaga also simultaneously served as president  of Diamond Electric’s U.S. subsidiary during the relevant period.  Additionally, the former executives have each  agreed to pay a $5,000 criminal fine and to cooperate with the department’s  ongoing investigation.  Each of the  Ikenaga’s plea agreements is subject to court approval.  On Sept. 10, 2013, Diamond Electric pleaded  guilty for its involvement in the conspiracy and was fined $19 million.

“The two former executives charged  today once again demonstrate the Antitrust Division’s vigorous commitment to  hold individuals accountable for engaging in anticompetitive conduct,” said  Brent Snyder, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division’s  criminal enforcement program.  “The division’s  ongoing investigation has resulted in more than two dozen executives serving  prison time for their participation in illegal, auto parts conspiracies.”

Diamond  Electric is a manufacturer of ignition coils and was engaged in the sale of  ignition coils in the United States and elsewhere. According to the charges, the  Diamond Electric executives and their co-conspirators carried out the  conspiracy by, among other things, agreeing during meetings and communications  to coordinate bids submitted to automobile manufacturers.

Each  executive is charged with price fixing and bid rigging in violation of the  Sherman Act, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1  million criminal fine for individuals.  The  maximum fine for an individual may be increased to twice the gain derived from  the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of  those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

Including  today’s charges, 28 individuals and 24 companies have been charged in the  government’s ongoing investigation into price fixing and bid rigging in the  auto parts industry.

Today’s charges  arose from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation into price fixing, bid  rigging and other anticompetitive conduct in the automotive parts industry,  which is being conducted by each of the Antitrust Division’s criminal  enforcement sections and the FBI.  Today’s pleas are the result of the National  Criminal Enforcement Section with the assistance of the Detroit Field Office of  the FBI.  Anyone with information on  price fixing, bid rigging and other anticompetitive conduct related to other  products in the automotive parts industry should contact the Antitrust  Division’s Citizen Complaint Center at 1-888-647-3258, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.html,  or call the Detroit Field Office of the FBI at 313-965-2323.

# # #

Three Northern California Real Estate Investors Agree To Plead Guilty To Bid Rigging at Housing Foreclosure Auctions: Investigation Has Yielded 43 Plea Agreements to Date WASHINGTON —

Posted on by

Three Northern California real estate investors have agreed to plead guilty for their roles in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California, the Department of Justice announced. Felony charges were filed today in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in Oakland against Rudolph Silva of Concord, Calif., Thomas Bishop of Pleasant Hill, Calif., and Leslie Gee of Danville, Calif. Including Silva, Bishop and Gee, a total of 43 individuals have pleaded guilty or agreed to plead guilty as a result of the department’s ongoing antitrust investigations into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California. According to court documents, Silva, Bishop and Gee conspired with others, for various lengths of time between January 2008 and January 2011, not to bid against one another, and instead to designate a winning bidder to obtain selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Contra Costa County, Calif. Silva, Bishop and Gee were also charged with conspiring to use the mail to carry out a scheme to fraudulently acquire title to selected Contra Costa County properties sold at public auctions, to make and receive payoffs and to divert money to co-conspirators that would have gone to mortgage holders and others by holding second, private auctions open only to members of the conspiracy. The department said that the selected properties were then awarded to the conspirators who submitted the highest bids in the second, private auctions. The private auctions often took place at or near the courthouse steps where the public auctions were held. Additional charges were filed against Gee for his involvement in similar conduct in Alameda County, Calif., from as early as April 2009 until about November 2009. “Today’s plea agreements are the latest step in the Antitrust Division’s efforts to hold accountable investors for their fraudulent and collusive activities at real estate foreclosure auctions,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “The division will continue to prosecute individuals who participated in illegal conspiracies and harmed distressed homeowners and lenders.” The department said that the primary purpose of the conspiracies was to suppress and restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in order to obtain selected real estate offered at Alameda and Contra Costa County public foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices. When real estate properties are sold at these auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the mortgage and other debt attached to the property, with remaining proceeds, if any, paid to the homeowner. According to court documents, these conspirators paid and received money that otherwise would have gone to pay off the mortgage and other holders of debt secured by the properties, and in some cases, the defaulting homeowner. “The FBI and our partners have an obligation to investigate and pursue those who disrupt a free and fair marketplace,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge David J. Johnson of the San Francisco Field Office. “We will continue to educate the public on the criminality of bid rigging at real estate foreclosure auctions.” A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals. The maximum fine for the Sherman Act charges may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims if either amount is greater than $1 million. A count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The government can also seek to forfeit the proceeds earned from participating in the conspiracy to commit mail fraud. Today’s charges are the latest filed by the department in its ongoing investigation into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa and Alameda counties, Calif. These investigations are being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San Francisco Office. Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to public real estate foreclosure auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office at 415-436-6660, or call the FBI tip line at 415-553-7400. Today’s charges were brought in connection with the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. The task force was established to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. With more than 20 federal agencies, 94 U.S. Attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it is the broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory agencies ever assembled to combat fraud. Since its formation, the task force has made great strides in facilitating increased investigation and prosecution of financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among federal, state and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending and financial markets and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial institutions and other organizations. Over the past three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed nearly 10,000 financial fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants, including more than 2,900 mortgage fraud defendants. For more information on the task force, please visit www.StopFraud.gov.

TWO NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTORS AGREE TO PLEAD GUILTY TO BID RIGGING AT PUBLIC REAL ESTATE FORECLOSURE AUCTIONS

Posted on by

WASHINGTON — Two Northern California real estate investors have agreed to plead  guilty for their roles in conspiracies to rig bids and commit mail fraud at  public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California, the Department  of Justice announced.

Felony charges were filed today in the U.S. District Court for the  Northern District of California, in San Francisco, against Florence Fung of  Sacramento, Calif, and Michael Navone of San Rafael, Calif.  Fung and Navone are  the 39th and 40th individuals to plead guilty or agree to  plead guilty as a result of the department’s ongoing antitrust investigations  into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in  Northern California.

According to court documents, Fung and Navone conspired  with others, for various lengths of time between February 2009 and January  2011, not to bid against one another, but instead to designate a winning bidder  to obtain selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San  Mateo County.  Fung and Navone  also were charged with conspiring to use the mail to carry out schemes to  fraudulently acquire title to selected properties sold at public auctions, to  make and receive payoffs and to divert money to co-conspirators that would have  gone to mortgage holders and others.  Navone  was also charged with participating in similar conspiracies in San Francisco  County beginning as early as October 2009 until about January 2011.

“Instead of competing at real estate foreclosure auctions, the  conspirators agreed not to bid against one another and determined among themselves  who would submit the winning bid, stifling honest and fair competition,” said Bill  Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s  Antitrust Division. “The Antitrust Division and its partners at the FBI  continue to remain committed to holding accountable investors who attempt to  subvert the competitiveness of the bidding process.”

The department said that the primary purpose of the  conspiracies was to suppress and restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in  order to obtain selected real estate offered at San Mateo and San Francisco county  public foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices.  When real estate properties are sold at these  auctions, the proceeds are used to pay off the mortgage and other debt attached  to the property, with remaining proceeds, if any, paid to the homeowner. According  to court documents, these conspirators paid and received money that otherwise  would have gone to pay off the mortgage and other holders of debt secured by  the properties, and, in some cases, the defaulting homeowner.

“The FBI continues to join the Antitrust Division in  holding criminals accountable for bid rigging and fraudulent practices at  public real estate foreclosure auctions,” said David J. Johnson, FBI Special  Agent in Charge of the San Francisco Field Office.  “Anticompetitive practices disrupt a fair  marketplace and the FBI will investigate these types of crimes.”

A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of  10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals.  The maximum fine for the Sherman Act charges  may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss  suffered by the victims if either amount is greater than $1 million.  A count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud  carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.  The government can also seek to forfeit the  proceeds earned from participating in the conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

Today’s charges are the latest filed by the department in  its ongoing investigation into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate  foreclosure auctions in San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa, and Alameda counties,  Calif.  These investigations are being  conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San  Francisco Office.  Anyone with  information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to public real estate  foreclosure auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office  at 415-436-6660, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.html or call the FBI tip line at  415-553-7400.

Today’s charges were brought in connection with the  President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.  The task force was established to wage an  aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute  financial crimes.  With more than 20  federal agencies, 94 U.S. Attorneys’ offices and state and local partners, it  is the broadest coalition of law enforcement, investigatory and regulatory  agencies ever assembled to combat fraud.  Since its formation, the task force has made  great strides in facilitating increased investigation and prosecution of  financial crimes; enhancing coordination and cooperation among federal, state  and local authorities; addressing discrimination in the lending and financial  markets and conducting outreach to the public, victims, financial institutions  and other organizations.  Over the past  three fiscal years, the Justice Department has filed nearly 10,000 financial  fraud cases against nearly 15,000 defendants, including more than 2,900  mortgage fraud defendants.  For more  information on the task force, please visit www.StopFraud.gov.